※ 引述《bkm1 (殷仔 加油!!!)》之铭言：
: : 你这篇跟pttccman的说法根本一样。
: : → pttccman:当然不是，前位跑者还没占据下个垒包或出局前，垒包都是 09/21 16:28
: : → pttccman:前位跑者的，不管当下他有没有摸到该垒包 09/21 16:30
这真的颇有趣, 我也想到一个例子大家指教一下:
二三垒有人无人出局, 打者打出左外野深远高飞球被接杀, 两位跑者都决定挑战外野手,
外野手选择传三垒. 二垒跑者快球一步, 被球触到时已经到达三垒.
那么他是不是就safe呢, 照上面说法是不一定的, 还要看三垒跑者是不是已经到了本垒,
两位跑者谁快谁慢很难说, 所以三垒审还得转头看看本垒的状况才能判决. 我想这是不
太合理的.
我还可以找人支持我的说法, 有请蓝鸟总教练 Gibbons:
http://wapc.mlb.com/play?content_id=30766821
完整问题从3:10开始, 以下片段从3:30开始:
I didn't think Jose touched the base, you know, once he touches it, it
establishes that's his base again. So you know Lawrie's out, he tagged Lawrie
and then Reyes came off the base (做出触杀手势) he's ... he's out, you know. So
they made the right call, I just didn't think Reyes touched the base, I thought
he went wide, you know, but yeah and Reyes said yeah I did touch so that's
the right call.
所以说, 要不是 Reyes 跑回去碰了三垒, 这三垒该是 Lawrie 的无误.