──────────────────────────────────────
[必]工 作 量： 约4000英字(word显示3972)
[必]工作报酬：4800元
[必]涉及语言：英译中(对不起原本英译英打错了)
[必]所属领域：工业工程
[必]文件类型：期刊
[必]截 稿 日：07/05
[必]应征期限：06/27
[必]联络方式：站内信给手机联络
[必]付费方式：订金800，翻译完成后2天内付清
─────────────────────────────────────
[选]工作要求：专有名词可以以原文呈现，但勿过度使用翻译软件
Abstract
Problem: This study evaluated common scaffold safety practices in
construction. Method: A 150-point checklist was used to evaluate
supported scaffold safety practices at 113 scaffolds in nine areas of the
eastern United States. Results: Thirty-six scaffolds (31.9%) were either in
danger of collapse or were missing planking, guardrails, or adequate access.
There was a strong statistical correlation between structural flaws
and fall protection hazards, and between proper scaffold safety practice and
(a) competent persons with scaffold safety training, (b) use of
separate scaffold erection contractors, and (c) scaffolds that were not
simple frame types. A slightly weaker correlation was found with union
status of the scaffold erector, and no correlation was found with geography,
site size, number of scaffold users, and trade working on the scaffold.
Discussion: Recommendations are made for safer scaffold practice, including a
simple 4-factor scaffold inspection method. Impact on
Industry: Implementation of the 4-factor method could result in a
cost-effective way to identify unsafe scaffolds.
D 2004 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.[选]参考段落: