[情报] Alstom获得下一代东北走廊新车合约

楼主: odkmse (朝鲜铁道省)   2016-08-27 09:32:21
节录重点
(1)订购28列Avelia Liberty取代ACELA
(2)最高速度可达300km/h(186mph),但营运速度维持257km/h(160 mph)
(3)新倾斜技术:Tiltronix,机车加入倾斜
(4)95%在美国生产,以及15年的支援
(5)合约价值18亿美金
Alstom and Amtrak announced today that they have signed a contract for Alstom
to design and build 28 new high-speed trains, which will run on the Northeast
Corridor (NEC) between Boston and Washington D.C. Amtrak and Alstom also
signed a long-term contract under which Alstom will provide Amtrak with
long-term technical support and supply spare components and parts for the
maintenance of the new trainsets. Together, these contracts are worth €1.8
billion ($2 billion).
The Northeast Corridor (NEC) line covers roughly 730 km (457 miles)[1]. In
only ten years, the number of passengers has increased from 2.4 million
passengers in FY 2002 to 3.5 million in FY 2014. As part of an effort to
renew and expand their premium product, Amtrak has therefore decided to
purchase new trainsets to replace the existing Acela trains [2], thus
increasing passenger capacity, providing more frequent service, minimizing
journey times, and improving operating costs and energy efficiency.
The train ordered by Amtrak is Avelia Liberty, the latest development of
Alstom’s high-speed train range Avelia. The new trainset will be able to
carry up to 33% more passengers than the current Acela trains. The trainset
configuration includes an innovative compact power car and nine passenger
cars, with the possibility of three more being added if demand grows. The
train is capable of travelling at speeds up to 300 km/h (186 mph), but will
initially operate at a maximum speed of 257 km/h (160 mph) based on NEC track
speed limits. Additionally, each concentrated power car is equipped with
Alstom’s pioneering Crash Energy Management (CEM) system.
Another key feature is the train’s articulated architecture, which provides
greater stability and passenger comfort while enhancing safety. The train
also includes Alstom’s innovative Tiltronix anticipative tilting technology,
which allows the train to manoeuvre curves safely and more comfortably at
high speeds.
“Amtrak is taking the necessary actions to keep our customers, the Northeast
region and the American economy moving forward,” said Amtrak President & CEO
Joe Boardman. “These trainsets and the modernization and improvement of
infrastructure will provide our customers with the mobility and experience of
the future.”
Jérôme Wallut, Senior Vice President, Alstom North-America said “Alstom’s
high speed trains, which we have branded Avelia, are the most advanced,
reliable and safest trains in the world. Avelia Liberty will not only provide
premium passenger experience but will also provide greater energy efficiency
and lower lifecycle costs. This award is an illustration of the success of
Alstom’s strategy of customer proximity. We would like to thank Amtrak for
its vote of confidence and remain fully dedicated to making this project a
success”.
Most of the Avelia Liberty for Amtrak will be manufactured in the United
States. The new trainsets will be manufactured at Alstom’s 150 year-old
historic site in Hornell, NY. They will be maintained in the depots of Amtrak
in Boston, New York and Washington DC under a specific Technical Support and
Spare Supply Agreement with additional support from Alstom’s sites in New
York, Delaware and Illinois for a period of 15 years, with an option for an
additional 15 years. These contracts will result in the creation of more than
1,000 jobs nationwide, including 750 in New York with 400 of those at Alstom
facilities.
In nearly 40 years, Alstom has sold more than 1,100 Avelia high speed trains
around the world and equipped over 300 more with its technology. As of
today, Alstom’s Avelia high-speed trains have covered over 6.4 billion
kilometres in 20 countries and transported 4 billion passengers.
[1] from Boston, Massachusetts, to Washington, D.C. via New York and
Philadelphia
[2] In commercial service since 2000. Trains manufactured by
Alstom-Bombardier Consortium
Alstom新闻稿
http://www.alstom.com/press-centre/2016/8/alstom-to-provide-amtrak-with-its-new-generation-of-high-speed-train/
作者: Jimmy2010   2016-08-27 10:12:00
东北走廊规格有办法喷300吗?
作者: Odakyu (青蛙骑士 瀬戸幸助)   2016-08-27 10:32:00
还用动力集中ob'_'ov
作者: komachi275 (笨笨熊)   2016-08-27 11:59:00
运作甚深的胖body哭哭了
作者: rdu20159 (RDU)   2016-08-27 12:02:00
路线不升级,买新车也没用吧
作者: geesegeese (殴)   2016-08-27 12:27:00
台铁等级的列车
作者: komachi275 (笨笨熊)   2016-08-27 14:20:00
帝国的阿斯拉新车引进计画是以分布式列车为蓝本的唷!尤其是庞巴迪经营很久,这次挫败恐怕与ACS-64表现出色脱不了关系。
作者: cutec (sasaki)   2016-08-27 15:03:00
本来Amtrak最早开出的规范是希望买动力分散的列车,但最后还是选择Alstom。
作者: kkStBvasut (奥匈帝国皇家铁道)   2016-08-27 15:05:00
东北走廊=东铁+马铁 (误
作者: shun01 (老胡做13年,青沼瞬活14年)   2016-08-27 17:53:00
日本:...
作者: rdu20159 (RDU)   2016-08-27 18:08:00
这次防护应该要更强了,ACS64最近折损率蛮高的
作者: atriple (请逐项修改)   2016-08-27 18:49:00
我猜是因为「东北」这个词让s大想到日本。
作者: cutec (sasaki)   2016-08-27 23:52:00
不过看本文的英文叙述并没有特别说机车会加入倾斜功能,通常动力集中的倾斜式列车是不会在机车配置倾斜功能,之前的Acela就是如此。最早Alstom在TGV上改造并验证自己整合研发的倾斜装置时也是如此,只有在客车的部分纳入倾斜功能。
作者: komachi275 (笨笨熊)   2016-08-28 00:07:00
或许是因为影片中的动力车会摇?
作者: cutec (sasaki)   2016-08-28 00:26:00
这个有趣,有可能是为了强调倾斜功能展示所以如此,具体的情况之后就会知道了。
作者: metalfinally   2016-08-28 00:28:00
那个影片里的车头,第一次看还以为是Pendolino系列但之后镜头拉远后,却是集中式的机车头,不是分布式混血混得还挺有趣的新车系
作者: Xkang (一日台大人 终生台大人)   2016-08-28 00:58:00
257kph喔 那是高铁了跟俄国 土耳其的高铁差不多 还比葡萄牙的alpha 奥地利的railjet快印尼高铁好像也是设定250最大
作者: ecpoem (CK101)   2016-08-28 02:40:00
如果路线不改善,160mph也是枉然
作者: shun01 (老胡做13年,青沼瞬活14年)   2016-08-28 06:20:00
不是日本跟大陆到处都在抢高铁合约?怎么这边两个都放弃?
作者: Alica (Torsades de Pointes)   2016-08-28 13:56:00
Buy America日本就直接放弃了吧 还不用说MU的维护成本哩
作者: ecpoem (CK101)   2016-08-28 14:10:00
日车早就在美国设工厂了,也拿下不少单子,包含通勤EMU
作者: Alica (Torsades de Pointes)   2016-08-28 14:24:00
要说通勤车美国厂当然不是没有 川崎当年让301过水的也是啊但是目前为止日本有在海外产过高铁车辆?
作者: Odakyu (青蛙骑士 瀬戸幸助)   2016-08-28 14:26:00
日立在英国设厂要制造800算不算?
作者: Alica (Torsades de Pointes)   2016-08-28 14:35:00
800速度只是一般1435水准 拉到美国就东北区间车 不到Acela
作者: ecpoem (CK101)   2016-08-28 15:20:00
“没在海外生产过高铁车辆”就是“直接放弃”?这逻辑还真顺啊...
作者: Alica (Torsades de Pointes)   2016-08-28 15:38:00
不然楼上可以说说日本提出过哪些符合FRA撞击标准的原型设计日本要标英国HS2还是很有机会的 但是标美国得过FRA撞击这关我是不认为日本设计拉到符合撞击标准后成本还有竞争力啦Buy America刚好变成下台阶
作者: komachi275 (笨笨熊)   2016-08-28 16:11:00
我只知道日本在媒体上放砲说FRA撞击标准是莫名其妙
作者: ecpoem (CK101)   2016-08-28 16:12:00
成本是因素没错,但日本会直接放弃美国高铁市场?
作者: Alica (Torsades de Pointes)   2016-08-28 16:29:00
我觉得日本想推美国的是磁浮啦 专用线自然没有FRA撞击问题但是NEC现况FRA没可能撤除撞击标准 对日本来说就很难吃下去吃不到葡萄嫌葡萄酸 经媒体放炮批评业主主管机关也就没啥了
作者: komachi275 (笨笨熊)   2016-08-28 17:08:00
日本在英国也批新机车头采购是过时思维...XD 吃不到
作者: omkizo (陈武爱带你笑掌)   2016-08-29 01:21:00
为何觉得1435跑200像喝水一样简单跟据UIC的定义 能跑200就算广义的高速铁路列车
作者: ecpoem (CK101)   2016-08-29 06:34:00
日车目前也在推美国城际客车,他们网站有说能做125mph的。但即使能做出125mph的,之后做不做得出160mph就不一定了
作者: komachi275 (笨笨熊)   2016-08-29 07:26:00
跑200不简单唷,老共传统线现在没有一条上200的
作者: cutec (sasaki)   2016-08-29 07:49:00
当初各国铁路城际客车(IC等级)的最高速有段很长时间维持在160,之后受1964东海道新干线启用的刺激,才开始推出时速200的IC。
作者: Alica (Torsades de Pointes)   2016-08-29 13:25:00
这边有点问题:传统线升级是跑200就算高铁吗?英文维基说DB IC不算 到底是哪里不算了?如果算高铁的话 那NEC从AEM-7上线就能称高铁了 不用等Acela
作者: cutec (sasaki)   2016-08-29 15:53:00
您是看到维基的说法才有如此问题吗? 我觉得那篇的说法是很有问题的第一个它提到法国的IC也不能算,但自从TGV出现后SNCF的IC已经基本不跑200了(通常都是160),所以并没有认定为高铁的问题。此外德国IC最高速通常为200(少数为220)且会被安排在传统线升级路段(最高速200-250)或专用的高速线上行驶,没有违反文中所述EC与UIC对高速铁路的定义条件。因此就这样来说,被否定的理由是不充分的。
作者: komachi275 (笨笨熊)   2016-08-29 16:42:00
好奇英国High speed train 是否为high speed rail?
作者: metalfinally   2016-08-29 21:19:00
InterCity125吗?
作者: omkizo (陈武爱带你笑掌)   2016-08-29 21:28:00
这样说吧 假设台铁用上黑科技能跑200惊艳全球 但它敢在西部自称高铁吗? 在东部说自己是高铁也会被说不要脸了在英国那几条大动脉都能跑200的路段 线上的小站都废了一堆
作者: Alica (Torsades de Pointes)   2016-08-29 21:32:00
你上面才说UIC定义(旧线升级)跑200就算 这边怎么又不算了
作者: omkizo (陈武爱带你笑掌)   2016-08-29 21:33:00
跟对岸15年前有87分像 但那几条线路没见过有打很大的广告说自己是高铁 建HS2也没见到有人嘴“已经有高铁了”这档事定义是这样啦 民众接不接受 营运者自不自称高铁是两回事
作者: Alica (Torsades de Pointes)   2016-08-29 21:36:00
如果没有台湾高铁 台铁有办法提速200然后自称高铁只能服他现况是有跑300的台湾高铁 所以跑200的自称高铁会被笑啦
作者: omkizo (陈武爱带你笑掌)   2016-08-29 21:41:00
按照EC和UIC的定义上越新干线不算是高铁(战
作者: komachi275 (笨笨熊)   2016-08-29 22:30:00
老共自己的定义对广深线的确有用高速化的名词毕竟人家引进了TVM300车载号志系统这比英国先进得多

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com