你引用的话的原文，AIA立法过程中参议员Leahy的发言
112th Congress Record
Leahy
We intend that if an inventor's actions are such as to constitute prior art
under subsection 102(a), then those actions necessarily trigger subsection
102(b)'s protections for the inventor and, what would otherwise have been
section 102(a) prior art, would be excluded as prior art by the grace period
provided by subsection 102(b). Indeed, as an example of this, subsection
102(b)(1)(A), as written, was deliberately couched in broader terms than
subsection 102(a)(1). This means that any disclosure by the inventor
whatsoever, whether or not in a form that resulted in the disclosure being
available to the public, is wholly disregarded as prior art. A simple way of
looking at new subsection 102(a) is that no aspect of the protections under
current law for inventors who disclose their inventions before filing is in
any way changed.
这整段话翻起来是说
我们希望"如果一个发明人的行为会构成102(a)的前案，则所述行为必然启动102(b)对
此发明人的保护，另一方面，会成为102(a)的前案的，就会被102(b)所提供的优惠期
所排除。确实，依据一个实例来说，被写下来的102(b)(1)(A)的用字是被刻意措词的比
102(a)(1)(的范围)更广。这代表着任何由此发明人所作的揭露，不管是不是被做成公开
的形式，都会被排除做为前案(的适格性)。简而言之，对于新的102(a)来说
现在的法律对在申请前揭露了其发明的发明人的保护没有任何一个面向被以任何方式改变
所以Leahy的立法目的究竟是什么不言而喻
※ 引述《VanDeLord (HelloWorld)》之铭言：
※ 编辑: VanDeLord (60.251.209.130), 08/06/2014 17:29:03
推 deathcustom:我没有不认同这个定义啊......so what? 08/06 16:59
→ deathcustom:明确来说，我文中并没有认为揭露一定是纸本的揭露 08/06 17:00
→ deathcustom:但这个并不影响我们讨论的主体(A揭露可否作为A1的前案 08/06 17:01
→ ipme:洗板? 08/06 17:24
→ ipme:你不是坚持说A可以作为A1的前案打进步性? 08/06 17:37
→ ipme:现在又说:优惠期间内所有专利权人的行为都不会成为先前技术 08/06 17:37
→ ipme:这是在搞笑吗? 08/06 17:38
推 deathcustom:i大，知错能改，善莫大焉，不要打脸了，要不然等等689 08/06 17:39
→ deathcustom:变9.2对你我都不好啊@@ 08/06 17:39
Disclosure包含document 和 actitivies
all activites 不代表all documents
以下猜猜看谁说的：
A simple way of looking at [the new grace period] is that no aspect
of the protections under current law for inventors who
disclose their inventions before filing is in any way changed.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Senator Leahy
※ 编辑: VanDeLord (60.251.209.130), 08/06/2014 17:44:58
→ ipme:你翻给大家看 这段在说什么 在证明一下你英文有没有问题 08/06 17:44