Re: [问题] 优惠期 新法 VS 旧法

楼主: VanDeLord (HelloWorld)   2014-08-06 16:49:16
http://www.uspto.gov/aia_implementation/FITF_Final_Guidelines_FR_2-14-2013.pdf
p11075
h. the meaning of "disclosure".
The AIA does not define the term "disclosure", and AIA 35 U.S.C 102(a) does not
use the term "disclosure". AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) and (b)(2), however, each
state conditions under which a "disclosure" that otherwise falls within AIA
35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) or 102(a)(2) is not prior art under AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1)
or 102(a)(2).
Thus, the Office is treating the term "disclosure" as a generic experssion
intended to encompass the ducoments and activities enumerated in AIA 35 U.S.C.
作者: deathcustom (第三人的到来)   2014-08-06 16:59:00
我没有不认同这个定义啊......so what?明确来说,我文中并没有认为揭露一定是纸本的揭露但这个并不影响我们讨论的主体(A揭露可否作为A1的前案
作者: ipme (oOpz!!!)   2014-08-06 17:24:00
洗板?你不是坚持说A可以作为A1的前案打进步性?现在又说:优惠期间内所有专利权人的行为都不会成为先前技术这是在搞笑吗?
作者: deathcustom (第三人的到来)   2014-08-06 17:39:00
i大,知错能改,善莫大焉,不要打脸了,要不然等等689变9.2对你我都不好啊@@
作者: ipme (oOpz!!!)   2014-08-06 17:44:00
你翻给大家看 这段在说什么 在证明一下你英文有没有问题你根本就是在乱扯什么依据? 拙劣还是优越的语文解读依据?

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com