※ 引述《VanDeLord (HelloWorld)》之铭言：
: US 102(b)(1) & (b)(2)
: Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 31 /
: Thursday, February 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
: comment#30 p11065~p11066
: http://www.uspto.gov/aia_implementation/FITF_Final_Guidelines_FR_2-14-2013.pdf
: Comment30:
: A number of comments, including comments from a number of universities and
: university groups, opposed the Office's interpretation of the subparagraph
: (B) provision of AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) or 102(b)(2)
: (the subparagraph (B) provision), requiring that the subject matter
: previously publicly disclosed by the inventor be identical to the subject
: matter of the disclosure to be disqualified under the subparagraph (B)
: provision (identical subject matter approach).
: The comments opposing the Office's
: interpretation of the subparagraph (B) provision stated that:
: ...blablabla...etc.
这里讨论的是35 U.S.C 102 (b) (1)(B)/(2)(B)
但是你忽略了(A)???
当我们这一串讨论串再讨论优惠期对于进步性的适用时，我觉得应该一并考虑(A)
102 (b)(1)(A)整个读起来是
A disclosure made 1 year or less before the effective filing date of a claimed
invention shall not be prior art to the claimed invention under subsection
(a)(1) if the disclosure was made by the inventor or joint inventor or by
another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from
the inventor or a joint inventor
在所请求发明的有效申请日以前的一年以内的揭露(对应于(a)(1)定义者)不应该做为先前
技术，如果所述揭露系由发明人、共同发明人或由前述两者处直接或间接得知所请发明主
体的第三人所做的
发明人在年初的ISSCC研讨会中揭露甲一
并且在年中申请相关的专利，独立项请求甲(甲一与甲二的上位概念)，附属项请求了
甲一与甲二
则在年初的研讨会揭露"依据102(b)(1)(A)"会被排除做为"先前技术的适格性"
当然如果有人在研讨会后马上去请了一个甲二的专利、或是去揭露一个甲二的变形
如果依据102(b)(1)(B)/(2)(B)
则"除非甲二这个概念是发明人提出来的，并且发明人同时提出甲是上位概念"，否则甲二
这个概念对于发明人想请的甲(独立项)就是先前技术，并且因为甲二也会一并使甲一GG
: Response:
: As discussed previously, the starting point for construction of a statute is
: the language of the statute itself.
: Subparagraph (B) of each of AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) and 102(b)(2) provides
: that certain disclosures shall not be prior art if ''the subject matter
: disclosed had, before such disclosure [or before such subject matter was
: effectively filed under 102(a)(2)], been publicly disclosed by the inventor
: or a joint inventor or another who obtained the subject matter disclosed
: directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor.''
: ...(略)
: The single instance of the phrase ''the subject matter'' in subparagraph (B)
: of each of AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) and 102(b)(2) cannot reasonably be read as
: concurrently describing two discrete subject matters. Therefore, the single
: instance of the phrase ''the subject matter'' in subparagraph (B) of each of
: AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) and 102(b)(2) cannot reasonably be interpreted as
: including variations within its ambit.
: AIA 35 U.S.C. 100 defines inventor and joint inventor or coinventor with
: respect to the individual or individuals ''who invented or discovered the
: subject matter of the invention, '' and defines "claimed invention'' as ''the
: subject matter defined by a claim in a patent or an application for a patent.''
: USPTO 这部分的guildline已经出了,很详细,应该很好找。
: