: → GSXSP: 那就还是P1的讨论阿, 参考看看Greg Koukl的解释和定义吧 10/22 15:03
: → GSXSP: 可以解释成矛盾证法, 但其实只有contra-positive 比较简单 10/22 15:06
: → GSXSP: Greg Koukl用的叙述就比较直接 如果OM存在, G就存在 10/22 15:09
你可以看看你贴的影片下方某个人写的
写得还不错
CryptographicVisions:
The Bible was written thousands of years ago... there are many moral issues
today that aren't discussed in the Bible. He only went over really basic
moral issues, not even considering modern ones like nuclear weapons or stem
cell research. Biblical writers would have never imagined the issues we deal
with today. And another issue to consider is that God broke his own rules.
God said not to kill in the ten commandments but later commanded his own to
kill. This is subjective morality. Is it moral because it is moral or
because god said it is moral? If God can change the moral guidelines when he
feels like it, then it was nothing more than a flexible rule to begin with.
The Bible's morality evolved just as the society writing it evolved.
简而言之 我的理解是 Greg Koukl所说的标准化道德量测始终无法解答所有尺度问题
他永远举例最明显最极端最基本的例子
那那些无法标准化的呢?比如说这个回应提到的干细胞研究
根本无法回答嘛
这种知识体系(或模型)无法一以贯之的讲述多面向问题那我要他干麻
另外有个影片还满推荐的
不知道板上是否讨厌这个人 XD
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hj9oB4zpHww
其他我就不赘述了 交由Sam Harris讲给你听
他的说法能涵盖到更广的区域