1 日本在条约对千岛群岛放弃的用语是跟福尔摩沙放弃的用语是一模一样的.
2 千岛群岛的地位我前面的PO文就有讲了,他的地位是跟琉球一样.
不然不可能拿出来对等比较.这是很简单的逻辑问题.
这也是为什么杜勒斯提醒崇光揆的原因.
不管最后苏联有没有跟日本签约都无法改变这个法理上相等的事实.
3 既然如此千岛群岛=琉球=台湾.
http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1955-57v23p1/d31
United States Position. We should continue to support Japan’s claim to the
Habomais and Shikotan on the theory that they are not part of the Kuriles and
remain part of Japan. It is our view that under the San Francisco Treaty,
Japan renounced all claim to the Kuriles and South Sakhalin and that
disposition of these territories is pending. The Soviet Union has attempted
formally to annex them. There are strong political reasons for encourgaging
Japan’s claim to at least part of the Kuriles: the Kuriles are strategically
important to the free world; Japan and the Soviet Union are the only two
logical contenders for the Kuriles although some form of international
control is theoretically possible; continued inaction on the part of Japan
and the other free nations may constitute tacit recognition of the Soviet
occupation. There are also reasons why we should not seek to change the
status quo: any United States action supporting Japan’s claim to the Kuriles
might appear to reflect on our position under the San Francisco Treaty in the Ryukyus and might
affect the status of Formosa, which Japan also renounced under the treaty;
encouragement of Japanese irredentism in the north might also encourage it in
the south; the hostile presence of the Soviet Union on Japan’s northern
border will serve as a constant irritant in their relations. Onbalance, however, it would appear desirable that as a minimum we offer no
objection to efforts on the part of Japan to get all or part of the Kuriles,
either as part of a deal whereby Japan might recognize a valid Soviet claim
to South Sakhalin (along the lines of the Japan–Russia treaty of exchange of 1875) or even on
the basis of a Soviet recognition of Japan’s residual sovereignty over all
or part of the Kuriles, comparable to our position in the Ryukyus and the
Bonins. We should also support any proposal by Japan to refer territorial
issues to the International Court of Justice.
美国的立场.我们应该继续支持日本对齿舞群岛与色丹岛他们不是千岛群岛的一部分这个
论述.他们是我们在旧金山和平条约下的观点,日本放弃所有对千岛群岛与南库页岛且那些
领土的立场是悬而未决的.苏联企图正式并吞他们.这里有强烈的政治理由去鼓励日本主张
至少部分的千岛群岛:千岛群岛战略上对自由世界是重要的;日本和苏联是唯一两个对千岛
群岛逻辑上的争夺者尽管一些国际上控制的形式是理论上可行的;继续在部分日本和其他
自由国家的不作为可能构成默示承认苏联的占领.这也是为什么我们不应该寻求改变现状
的理由:任何美国支持日本主张对千岛群岛的动作可能出现在旧金山和约下我们对琉球的
立场带来影响且可能影响到日本也在条约下放弃的福尔摩沙地位,在北方鼓励日本人民的
民族主义可能也在南方鼓励他;总而来看,然而,它可能出现一个最低令人满意的限度我们
建议不反对日本尽部分的努力去取得所有或部分的千岛群岛,藉以日本可能承认一个苏联
对南库页岛(以1875年日本与俄罗斯交换和约的方式)合法的主张的一个部份的交易或者以
苏联承认日本对千岛群岛部分或全部的剩余主权为对等的基础下,可比的上我们对于琉球
与小笠原群岛的立场.我们应该也要支持任何由日本提议把领土的归属争议提交到国际法
院.