Re: [闲聊] 棒子爷 VS 普侯斯

楼主: abc12812   2011-10-25 13:12:00
推 lingjj:3.史上单季52+轰里头(共31人)14次来自类固醇世代 确定有问 10/25 07:19
→ lingjj:题的Bonds、阿肉、马怪和索沙占10次 04年后只有4次 10/25 07:22
推 lingjj:把标准降到50轰 则从10:4变成11:6 还是很悬殊 10/25 07:40
推 lingjj:把标准提高到55+轰就更有趣了 10/25 07:43
摘录自一个十年前对用球的研究:
http://steroids-and-baseball.com/changing-baseball.shtml
弹性: Platek and Gregory conducted another series of bounce tests on the pills;
the scientists conducted about 20 drops with each. They found that the average
height of the bounces from the 1995 and 2000 pills, when dropped from a
height of 182 inches, was 83 and 82 inches respectively. None of the pills
from 1963, 1970, and 1989 averaged over 62 inches. The newer pills each
bounced at least 1/3 higher than the older ones.
结构: The URI study showed that baseballs from two well-separated years in the
post-1993 era (1995 and 2000) were very like each other, yet very different
from balls from pre-1993 years; it also showed significant categorical
differences between the older Spalding and newer Rawlings balls. The Penn
State study showed a marked increase in zip from 1977 on. All that agrees
with the stats-indicated and common-sense indicated belief in a big jump when
the ball maker was changed between 1976 and 1977, as well as the belief that
there was a subsequent jump starting in 1993 and in full force in 1994.
很多事情不是只看表面数据加上脑补就可以说明一切的
(看看今年日职打击降多惨,怎么没人怀疑是不是之前禁药爽爽吃?)
作者: EVA96 (键盘亲卫队)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
恩! 看不懂
作者: externaload (Vision of disorder)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
又在脑补了 唉
作者: AWainwright (我将再起)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
还不是靠__球
作者: pasaword (P幣拿來)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
日职今年真的很夸张...
作者: bbdirty5566 (尊爵不凡蓝鸟40)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
依你的观点 这篇好像也是脑补
作者: PlayStation3 (超级喜欢于小文)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
可怜的56。
作者: ppoll2 (Stat Counseling)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
恩恩
作者: filla (太阳がいるから)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
又在__了
作者: borriss (松)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
因为罢工球迷跑掉太多 <=这才是脑补
作者: lingjj (观察员)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
你有没有看本文结论?结论是93年后的球没啥差别(本文只比到
作者: lingjj (观察员)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
2000年)但和93年以前的球差别甚大 而我比较的是类固醇世代
作者: lingjj (观察员)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
前后 要反驳我说我脑补可以 好歹拿个2003、04年前后的用球
作者: lingjj (观察员)   0000-00-00 00:00:00
比较文吧!随便拿一篇英文研究来搞笑喔?

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com