不吵架 纯讨论
假设Lec率先进pit
对于战局换胎策略会有很大的改变吗？
Sainz可能会先不换，以免卡到。
Ham可能不换用10圈的白胎拼。
那后面的呢？per, Lando会换还是不换
—》lec换胎出来的位置会变p几？
最后这场的P1会是谁？
红军的最后成绩是？
有没有人还有印象秒差可以沙盘推演一下？
※ 引述《onejoeluo (onejoe)》之铭言：
: https://www.racefans.net/2022/07/05/racefans-round-up-05-07-5/
: Ferrari chose to pit second-placed Carlos Sainz Jnr but not race leader
: Leclerc when the Safety Car was deployed towards the end of the British Gran
d
: Prix. Leclerc fell from first to fourth, passed by Sainz and two other
: drivers who pitted for fresh tyres.
: 当英国大奖赛接近收官的时刻出动安全车时，法拉利选择让当下第二的Sainz进站而非
领
: 先的Leclerc。
: Lec从第一掉到第四，被Sainz与另外两名换了新胎的车手超越。
: Binotto said “it was common sense to prioritise the lead car by protecting
: track positions” at that point in the race. “There’s nothing unusual in
: this strategy, we always prioritise the lead car and therefore Charles in
: this situation. He was on fresher tyres at that point, and if he had pitted,
: our opponents would have done the exact opposite and gained track position o
n
: almost new hard tyres.”
: 比诺托表示: 在那个状况下"优先考虑领先车的位置是常识"
: "策略没有问题，我们一直都优先考虑领先车，因此Lec在那个位置"
: "Lec的胎当下较新(跟Sainz比?)，如果他进站，对手会反过来(不进站)而且在有新白胎
的
: 状况下推进位置"
: “Just think of Lewis Hamilton at last year’s season finale in Abu Dhabi
: when he stayed out on track,” he added. Mercedes chose not to pit Hamilton
: from the lead during a late Safety Car period, a decision which cost them
: when the race was unexpectedly restarted in a manner which did not conform
: with the regulations.
: 比诺托补充: "想想去年阿布达比最后(出安全车时)Ham没进去换胎"
: 奔驰在比赛末段的安全车下选择不叫Ham进站，这个决定在比赛未依常规重启后让他们
付
: 出了代价。
: “At the same time we decided to put Carlos on the opposite strategy in orde
r
: to cover all opportunities,” Binotto added. “If we wouldn’t have done tha
t
: split strategy, we would have risked losing the race and handing the win to
: our opponents.”
: 比诺托补充: "同时我们决定让Sainz做相反的策略来对应所有的状况"
: "如果我们没有错开策略，我们很可能会输掉比赛并将胜利拱手让人"
: