https://www.racefans.net/2022/07/05/racefans-round-up-05-07-5/
Ferrari chose to pit second-placed Carlos Sainz Jnr but not race leader
Leclerc when the Safety Car was deployed towards the end of the British Grand
Prix. Leclerc fell from first to fourth, passed by Sainz and two other
drivers who pitted for fresh tyres.
当英国大奖赛接近收官的时刻出动安全车时，法拉利选择让当下第二的Sainz进站而非领
先的Leclerc。
Lec从第一掉到第四，被Sainz与另外两名换了新胎的车手超越。
Binotto said “it was common sense to prioritise the lead car by protecting
track positions” at that point in the race. “There’s nothing unusual in
this strategy, we always prioritise the lead car and therefore Charles in
this situation. He was on fresher tyres at that point, and if he had pitted,
our opponents would have done the exact opposite and gained track position on
almost new hard tyres.”
比诺托表示: 在那个状况下"优先考虑领先车的位置是常识"
"策略没有问题，我们一直都优先考虑领先车，因此Lec在那个位置"
"Lec的胎当下较新(跟Sainz比?)，如果他进站，对手会反过来(不进站)而且在有新白胎的
状况下推进位置"
“Just think of Lewis Hamilton at last year’s season finale in Abu Dhabi
when he stayed out on track,” he added. Mercedes chose not to pit Hamilton
from the lead during a late Safety Car period, a decision which cost them
when the race was unexpectedly restarted in a manner which did not conform
with the regulations.
比诺托补充: "想想去年阿布达比最后(出安全车时)Ham没进去换胎"
奔驰在比赛末段的安全车下选择不叫Ham进站，这个决定在比赛未依常规重启后让他们付
出了代价。
“At the same time we decided to put Carlos on the opposite strategy in order
to cover all opportunities,” Binotto added. “If we wouldn’t have done that
split strategy, we would have risked losing the race and handing the win to
our opponents.”
比诺托补充: "同时我们决定让Sainz做相反的策略来对应所有的状况"
"如果我们没有错开策略，我们很可能会输掉比赛并将胜利拱手让人"