请益版上大大以下两题
Given the other things being equal, assume that the private sector would raise funds
by issuing bonds of 50 million. Now the government also issue bond to expend
the spending of 100 million.Which of the following statements is false?
(A) The supply of Bond would increase to 150 million and the interest rate
would increase in case of No crowding out effect
(B) The supply of Bond and the interest rate would Not increase in case of
complete crowding out effect
(C) The supply curve of Bond would sharply shift to the right and the
interest rate would increase in case of excessive crowding out effect
(D) The supply curve of Bond would slightly shift to the right and the
interest rate would increase in case of incomplete crowding out effect
这题我理解B选项为错
但是A,C,D不太了解
A选项如果发生无排挤效果应该利率不会上升,为何会是正确的
C选项的excessive crowding out effect是指什么情况
If the income taxes on wages increase, the labor supply curve will shift left,
but what happens to the unemployment rate
a. It unambiguously falls because the labor participation rate changes.
b. It unambiguously falls because some workers drop out of the workforce.
c. It unambiguously rises because some workers drop out of the workforce.
d. It is ambiguous because some workers drop out of the workforce.
e. None of the above is correct.
首先要如何得知在未变化前是劳力市场均衡还是有失业
若原先处在w高于市场结清工资,供过于求有失业,则供给线左移后失业会下降,
但因仍供过于求,就业量仍等于劳力需求,不变（杨莉总经有一题为此观念）
若原先为均衡状态,供给左移后均衡就业量会减少,但不知失业量为何如何判断失业率变化
问题有点长,感谢耐心解答～～