既然官方已经承认两个版本有2~3%电力差异，请问可以投诉行政院消费者保护会吗
http://www.cpc.ey.gov.tw/
小的认为政府应该出面要求Apple在产品外盒注明14奈米or16奈米制造
让消费者有权力决定想买什么产品
否者让消费者花大钱，却是抽到电力较差产品，枉顾消费者权益
或是政府应该出面规定Apple要让消费者买到电力较差2~3%产品有退换货权力
或是投诉立委有用吗？
小的不是法律系毕业的，不懂法律，
所以才希望消保会出面解释，
如果违法了，就应该纠正Apple标示不明
如果Apple行为不违法
消保会也该出面说明不违法原因，例如台湾法条未明文规定需在外盒标式产品奈米制程
，消保会并应该提醒消费者有可能买到不同制程差异产品，
我猜大部分的消费者应该都不知道产品有制程差异的
另外，小的认为，Apple也没公布它的测试环境、测试条件等，
如果公布的话，一定会有专家真的去测试Apple宣称的效能是否属实。
既然Apple官方没公布测试环境/条件，消费者无法得
知其宣称效能是否属实，却又承认制程差异有较差2~3%电力，就应该在产品外盒标示清楚
这样消费者才有选择的机会，这是消费者该有的权力
※ 引述《mmmmmfff (发牢骚！)》之铭言：
: 原文请跳转
: http://www.macrumors.com/2015/10/08/apple-a9-chip-2-3-percent-difference/
: 全文以及翻译如下 翻译有我个人加油添醋的语气，不喜欢的话请看原文。
: （其实看第一段就够了）
: Over the past several days, a slew of battery tests on the iPhone 6s and the
: iPhone 6s Plus have revealed some performance differences between
: models that have an A9 chip manufactured by TSMC and those with an A9
: chip created by Samsung. While variousbenchmarking and real world usage
: tests have shown differences of 6 percent to 22 percent, in favor of TSMC
: chips, Apple says that its own testing has shown battery life variations of
: only two to three percent.
: 在过去几天，有大量两种版本芯片制成的6s与6s plus的电力测试。
: 台积电与三星的A9芯片，在多方测试之下，有着6~22%的电力续航力差距。
: 但是苹果认为，实际的差异只有2~3%而已。
: In a statement given to TechCrunch, Apple says that it has done internal
: testing and gathered customer data to determine the performance difference
: between the two chips in the iPhones.
: 在一份给TechCrunch的声明稿中，苹果表示经过内部测试以及蒐集了消费者的资料。
: 两种芯片的差异已经有了结果。
: With the Apple-designed A9 chip in your iPhone 6s or iPhone 6s Plus, you are
: getting the most advanced smartphone chip in the world. Every chip we ship
: meets Apple's highest standards for providing incredible performance and
: deliver great battery life, regardless of iPhone 6s capacity, color, or model.
: Certain manufactured lab tests which run the processors with a continuous
: heavy workload until the battery depletes are not representative of real-world
: usage, since they spend an unrealistic amount of time at the highest CPU
: performance state. It's a misleading way to measure real-world battery life.
: Our testing and customer data show the actual battery life of the iPhone 6s
: and iPhone 6s Plus, even taking into account variable component differences,
: vary within just 2-3% of each other.
: 我们设计的A9芯片根本是科技的尖端，你拿到的是世界上最棒的手机。
: 无论你拿哪个型号或颜色，你都可以得到最棒的效能、卓越的电量、快乐的人生。
: 最近很多人在帮我们做不同制成芯片的电力测试，喔，拜托，谁会那样测。
: 现实生活有谁会拿着手机24小时不断的让CPU满载阿。根本一点也不现实。
: 在一般日常使用下，电力只会差2~3%啦。
: Apple says that early battery benchmark tests conducted by customers,
: such as those weshared yesterday, are not reflective of real world usage
: conditions. The two to three percent difference that Apple has seen in data
: gathered from customers is "well within its manufacturing tolerances" and is a
: level of variation that could be seen between two devices with the same chip.
: Apple's statement on real world usage reflects what recent YouTube tests have
: revealed. Side-by-side battery tests comparing a TSMC iPhone and a Samsung
: iPhone did not show differences as dramatic as benchmark tests have shown,
: but those videos are also not quite indicative of real world usage results. On the
: MacRumors forums, opinions on battery life have been highly mixed. While some
: users with Samsung chips have reported poor battery life, others have not
: reported issues.
: 这两段只是做总结，基本上跟前面说的差不多，懒得翻了。
: 总之，苹果承认两种芯片有差异，但认为这只是公差的正常值。
: 不要嘘我QQ，我只是在等官网开卖无聊，转贴新闻不是在护航。
: