原文请跳转
http://www.macrumors.com/2015/10/08/apple-a9-chip-2-3-percent-difference/
全文以及翻译如下 翻译有我个人加油添醋的语气，不喜欢的话请看原文。
（其实看第一段就够了）
Over the past several days, a slew of battery tests on the iPhone 6s and the
iPhone 6s Plus have revealed some performance differences between
models that have an A9 chip manufactured by TSMC and those with an A9
chip created by Samsung. While variousbenchmarking and real world usage
tests have shown differences of 6 percent to 22 percent, in favor of TSMC
chips, Apple says that its own testing has shown battery life variations of
only two to three percent.
在过去几天，有大量两种版本芯片制成的6s与6s plus的电力测试。
台积电与三星的A9芯片，在多方测试之下，有着6~22%的电力续航力差距。
但是苹果认为，实际的差异只有2~3%而已。
In a statement given to TechCrunch, Apple says that it has done internal
testing and gathered customer data to determine the performance difference
between the two chips in the iPhones.
在一份给TechCrunch的声明稿中，苹果表示经过内部测试以及蒐集了消费者的资料。
两种芯片的差异已经有了结果。
With the Apple-designed A9 chip in your iPhone 6s or iPhone 6s Plus, you are
getting the most advanced smartphone chip in the world. Every chip we ship
meets Apple's highest standards for providing incredible performance and
deliver great battery life, regardless of iPhone 6s capacity, color, or model.
Certain manufactured lab tests which run the processors with a continuous
heavy workload until the battery depletes are not representative of real-world
usage, since they spend an unrealistic amount of time at the highest CPU
performance state. It's a misleading way to measure real-world battery life.
Our testing and customer data show the actual battery life of the iPhone 6s
and iPhone 6s Plus, even taking into account variable component differences,
vary within just 2-3% of each other.
我们设计的A9芯片根本是科技的尖端，你拿到的是世界上最棒的手机。
无论你拿哪个型号或颜色，你都可以得到最棒的效能、卓越的电量、快乐的人生。
最近很多人在帮我们做不同制成芯片的电力测试，喔，拜托，谁会那样测。
现实生活有谁会拿着手机24小时不断的让CPU满载阿。根本一点也不现实。
在一般日常使用下，电力只会差2~3%啦。
Apple says that early battery benchmark tests conducted by customers,
such as those weshared yesterday, are not reflective of real world usage
conditions. The two to three percent difference that Apple has seen in data
gathered from customers is "well within its manufacturing tolerances" and is a
level of variation that could be seen between two devices with the same chip.
Apple's statement on real world usage reflects what recent YouTube tests have
revealed. Side-by-side battery tests comparing a TSMC iPhone and a Samsung
iPhone did not show differences as dramatic as benchmark tests have shown,
but those videos are also not quite indicative of real world usage results. On the
MacRumors forums, opinions on battery life have been highly mixed. While some
users with Samsung chips have reported poor battery life, others have not
reported issues.
这两段只是做总结，基本上跟前面说的差不多，懒得翻了。
总之，苹果承认两种芯片有差异，但认为这只是公差的正常值。
不要嘘我QQ，我只是在等官网开卖无聊，转贴新闻不是在护航。

在我翻译原文的时候原来有人po了但看在我辛苦翻译的情况下 我可以不删文吗 QQ

抱歉 因为爱困 我只翻重点 XD

你害我以为苹果真的说“快乐的人生”...

意思就是：“真的有差啊！一点点而已啦！”

平常只用用line 上上网不会影响啦。 有tsmc版可换吗

感谢翻译就是承认了为什么要找鲁蛇制造

怒嘘凌晨派对累得要死买到三星

楼上拍拍

不过至少其他功能完全正常，只能这样安慰自己三星再鸟，应该续航还是屌打我之前的5时（阿Q心态）

意思是低度使用不会有影响吗？

最棒的效能、卓越的电量、快乐的人生，还差考试都考100分

但也不是每个人都不会重度使用，连续打game或看影片应该都有差吧！

2%,可以省多少电了 ，如果一年卖出一亿2千万只6s ...无聊算一下

有差别还敢卖 贾柏斯都要从地底爬起来了

就是不想拿到爽爽爽的不行？

苹果急了？

看来苹果规格应该是订5%以内允收~哈

辛苦翻译上色

苹果当然要这样说啦不意外 难道召回2000万+台三星吗

可以算一下用台积的CPU可以省几度电吗？

要省电 关机不要用最省 两种cpu一样平等

你玩游戏上网不会full load?骗小孩吗？

就算苹果这样说，还是想要tsmc啊，还是有差

这种声明代表性能差异很大，不是三星差而是gg性能好太多

无耻 厂商

这样不是直接打脸以前大部分的电力评测 手机不是这样用低......

那抽到要不要退我2～3%的钱

天线门的时候也没承认，看起来是差很大啦..这样搞.....已经卖这么贵了..还要贪小便宜用三爽的芯片..

这篇文反过来看就是承认高负载时会有明显差异而且还有多余废热的问题 三星的会变暖炉

清者自清，会想要解释就是明显有差

这就是苹果官方正式承认cpu有差异，内部应该在研拟对

推 签名档，爱地球 自备环保杯！

台积电版 A9 续航力比三星多 2 小时!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

三星去死

混料还敢说那么多 干!!! 就是有差异啊 我爽跑MCU满载不行

快乐的人生 XDDD

商人就是商人 出来灭火了 可惜大家还是要选TSMC

狗屁 6的壳设计太薄容易凹死不承认 现在又有缺陷zzz