来源：
http://bit.ly/2VsBFHv
Toyota has the highest degree of self-driving cars, 27,000% more than Baidu's
Apollo
Toyota 的无人驾驶车辆有着最高的跳脱率，比起百度的Apollo 高出270倍
Baidu's open source Apollo self-driving car platform is the king of 2019 with
a minimum separation distance per mile.
百度的Apollo 开源无人驾驶测试车在2019年称王，有着最小的跳脱率。
Baidu
One of the things that makes California unique in the development of
autonomous vehicles is that it requires developers to submit some
Disengagement report Per year.
百度
对于无人驾驶车辆测试来说，每年要求提供无人驾驶脱离报告是加州的一项与
众不同之处。
This disengagement report-don't confuse with DC's outstanding performance
Dismemberment plan -Is a detailed log of human safety drivers being forced to
control self-driving cars under any circumstances during tests on public
roads, and the circumstances that caused this. This is one of the best
indicators of the public's understanding of how advanced a given company's
self-driving car program is.
这份脱离接触报告详细记录了人类安全驾驶员被迫接管无人驾驶车辆的状况。
这是大众了解特定公司的无人驾驶车辆计划有多先进的最好指标之一。
in the past few years, Waymo Usually, it is dominated by the least
disengagement per mile, but it looks like Chinese Baidu, And Open source
Apollo The self-driving car platform went away and pulled Jon Snow from a
relative in Denvers Targaryen, Mountain View.
过去几年，Waymo 保持着每英里跳脱率最少的纪录，但今年来自中国的百度其
Apollo 开源无人驾驶车平台其表现着实让我们眼前一亮。
Specifically, Baidu achieved a staggering 0.06 departures per thousand miles
driven, and its four development vehicles traveled a total of 100,300.2 miles
in 2019. All its disengagements (only six times in total) occurred on ground
streets, not on highways or freeways. This is a common theme for most
reporting companies.
具体来说，2019年百度Apollo 平台实现了每一千英里里程只有0.06次的惊人跳
脱率，该公司的四辆开发测试车总共行驶了100300.2 英里。所有的(只有六次)
的跳脱状况都是在地面街道上发生，而不是在高速公路或快速道路上。这也是
大多数公司所报告的普遍现象。
Waymo and Cruise are tied for second. Their clutch per 1,000 miles is only
0.08. For brevity, we will call them Wallys from now on. Baidu. Cruise has
227 cars on the road and travels 831,039.9 miles. Waymo only conducted 147
car tests, but In a typical Waymo wayThey did go a long way-exactly
1,453,137.3. This is equivalent to three round trips to the moon.
Waymo 与Cruise 则是并列第二。他们的每千英里跳脱率只有0.08次。Cruise
共有227辆测试车并且共跑了831039.9 英里。Waymo 有147辆测试车，但Waymo
的总测试里程数更多，有1453137.3英里，相当于可以往返月球三次。
How have these numbers improved since 2018? Facts have proven to be
significant. Best of Waymo-and best of all reports Submitted to 2018 -It's
0.09 Wallis. Baidu's 0.06 is a very serious bump, and even Cruise and Waymo's
own 0.01 Wally decline should not be underestimated.
那这些数据自从2018年后改善了多少？在2018年时，Waymo 最好(也是所有公司
中最好)的跳脱率是0.09。百度今年的0.06跳脱率是一个非常大的冲击，甚至Cruise
与Waymo 的0.01次的降幅也不可小看。
So now we have seen the best. Which major companies are underperforming in
producing self-driving cars? Well, unfortunately, the top three of this year
are all traditional car manufacturers. Mercedes Benz It was the worst one,
with 140 of them coming from 18 cars and driving 14,238 miles.
前几名看过了。那哪些大公司在研发无人驾驶车辆时表现不佳？不幸的是，今
年的倒数三名都是传统汽车制造商。Benz 是其中之一，他们的18辆无人驾驶测
试车一共行驶了行驶了14238英里，跳脱率高达140次/千英里。
The second worst is the Munich people-I mean BMW, of course -Scored 370
Wallys. This was produced by five cars that only traveled 21.36 miles. Maybe
if they pay more, the results will improve, but we have to see how they
perform in 2020.
第二糟的是BMW，跳脱率是370次/千英里。他们只有五辆车共行驶了21.36英里。
Finally, at the bottom of the proverbial bucket is Toyota cars the study. Its
researchers managed a staggering 1,620 of Wally among six cars traveling only
1,817 miles. Especially one car-VIN number JTHDU1EF3G5020098, which was a
liar-completed an amazing 900 breaks on its own in just 534 test miles.
最后，至于备受关注的Toyota，该公司用6辆测试车行驶了1817英里，但却给出
了跳脱率1620次/千英里 的垫底成绩。特别是一辆VIN 为JTHDU1EF3G5020098
的测试车，竟然在短短534英里的测试里程中，跳脱了惊人的900次。
It's easy to joke now, but the truth is that developing self-driving cars is
unusual, crazy, incredible, very, very difficult. Toyota hasn't done this in
a while, and although it obviously has a way to go, we implore it:
Toyota's self-driving cars plan to underperform in 2019, but there will
always be next year!
Oh if you are curious Tesla That's all, rest assured, Elon & company
submitted a disengagement report. The Big T has zero detachment (yes, zero),
but it's important to note that it is only equipped with one car, and the car
only travels 12.2 miles. So yes, fully autonomous driving is Imminent, you
guys.
=====================================================================
加州车辆管理局(DMV) 每年都会要求在该州测试无人驾驶车辆的公司提供数据，
其中平均每一千英里需要人工接管几次的跳脱率一直倍受关注。
过去一直都是Waymo 领先，而且领先幅度不小。另外一家新创公司Cruise 成绩
通常也不错，然后前几年就被GM 收购了，所以GM 一直对他们的自驾技术很有
自信。
在加州测试的公司还有一大堆，除了像是Apple、Tesla 这些美国本土公司外，
来自中国的公司也非常的多，2019年的DMV 无人驾驶报告里前十名有快半是中
国公司：
https://i.imgur.com/Oh5Ykf6.png
另外有趣的是，不晓得是不是因为脱离率被百度追上，Waymo 在这报告发布不
久后就写了推特，说脱离率并不能够代表各公司实际的研发状况好坏。
╭───────────────────────────────╮
│https://twitter.com/Waymo/status/1232758355082375168 │
│ │
│Waymo │
│ │
│1/7 We appreciate what the California DMV was trying to do │
│when creating this requirement, but the disengagement metric │
│does not provide relevant insights into the capabilities of │
│the Waymo Driver or distinguish its performance from others │
│in the self-driving space. │
╰───────────────────────────────╯
不过Waymo 会这样说是正确的，因为这份报告是由各公司自己提供，其实际状
况可能会不一样，或许有些公司选择的路线比较简单、或许有别的因素，简单
的说就是测试的基准并不相同。
DMV 报告连结：
http://bit.ly/32zsert