the principal occuyping Power的翻译用军事占领似乎比较恰当.
美国是台湾主要军事占领国(the principal occuyping Power). 所以台湾不属
联合国托管(这也是中国无权置啄之因)
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-caDC-08-05078
On September 8, 1951, Japan signed the San Francisco
Peace Treaty (“SFPT”) and officially renounced “all right, title
and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.” Treaty of Peace
with Japan, art. 2(b), Sept. 8, 1951, 3 U.S.T. 3169, 136 U.N.T.S.
45. The SFPT does not declare which government exercises
sovereignty over Taiwan. It does generally identify the United
States as “the principal occupying Power,” but does not indicate
over what. Id. at art. 23(a).
nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/large/cab-129-73.pdf
国际观点: 台湾de facto, de jure不属于中国(包括中华人民共和国及中华民国).
中华民国顶多正在管理台湾.
Formosa and the Pescadores are, therefore, in the view of Her Majesty's
Government, territory the de jure sovereignty over which is uncertain or
undetermined. In the meantime, Her Majesty's Government do in practice
recognise the Chinese Nationalists as the authority administering Formosa;
but they do not recognise them as the de facto government of Formosa,
whether as part of China or on any other basis, since they do not regard
Formosa, as such, as constituting a separate State.
※ 引述《nnkj (男鹿大人)》之铭言：
: http://taiwangok.blogspot.tw/2008/09/23-partofchina.html
: 台湾属于中国的理由 ◎ 傅云钦（律师 / 建国广场负责人） 2008.09.23
...
: 和统派看法一样──台湾事实上（de facto）独立，法律上（de jure）统一，属于中国
: 。但我不是统派，因为在理想上，统派主张走向事实上统一，我则主张法律上独立。我是
: 新观念的独派，姑且称为“脱中独立派”。
: 为什么台湾属于中国呢？这要先从法律的条文或原则的基本结构谈起。
...