: 事实上政党或政治人物随着时代不同需求而改变是非常普遍的
: 如1864年美国共和党总统林肯为了黑人权利不惜发动战争
我看到这个连删掉的Pchome都装回来了只为了回你这一句
我想请很多人多查证历史好吗？
林肯为了黑人权利发动战争？
你真的这样觉得吗？
引述林肯1858年对议员史提芬.道格拉斯的辩论
“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing
about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black
races - that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of
negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white
people”
"我必须说我并没有,也从来都没有让黑白两种族获得社会或政治平等的意图 -
我无意也从来没有意图使让黑人拥有投票权或是成为陪审员, 成为政府官员, 或是
和白人通婚。"
同样一场辩论
"and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position
assigned to the white race."
"我和许多人一样偏好把高位分派给白人"
林肯从头到尾都不是为了黑人的权益开战
而很少有人愿意站在"邪恶的"南方的角度思考南北战争
我就直接给开战的理由吧
当南方表示想要脱离合众国, 一名林肯的幕僚表示不如就让南方联盟国和平脱离
林肯这么回答了: “Let the South go? Where, then, would we get our revenue!”
＂让南方脱离？那么，我们的税金要从哪来！＂
而南方为什么想脱离？
让我们看看南方的说法如何？
“Every man should endeavor to understand the meaning of subjugation before
it is too late…
It means the history of this heroic struggle will be written by the enemy;
that our youth will
be trained by Northern schoolteachers; will learn from Northern school books
their version of the war;
will be impressed by the influences of history and education to regard our
gallant dead as traitors,
and our maimed veterans as fit objects for derision… It is said slavery is
all we are fighting for,
and if we give it up we give up all. Even if this were true, which we deny,
slavery is not all our enemies
are fighting for. It is merely the pretense to establish sectional
superiority and a more centralized form
of government, and to deprive us of our rights and liberties.”
所有人都该在太迟之前致力于了解被征服的意义...
这意谓著这场英雄式的斗争将会被敌人给改写；我们的年轻子弟会被北方教师训练；
学习北方版本的这段战史；会被历史和教育给影响，转将我们的勇者视为叛徒，我
们残废的军人成为被嘲弄的对象...
他们说我们只是为了保有奴隶制度而战，说我们认定将其放弃便是放弃一切。就算这
是真的，而我们否认这点，我们的敌人也不是为了解放奴隶而战。
这只是为了建立区域优越性和一个更中央集权的政府，以及剥夺我们的权力和自由的
矫饰托词。
Patrick R. Cleburne少将，于1864年一月
历史就是这样，谁赢了，谁写。而在这个充满谎言和真相纸包不住火的年代，
我们的责任就是去将当权者不愿意公开的事情揭露出来。
所以我不希望任何人用嘲弄的语气说打脸或是肿肿的了，因为我们曾经都被蒙蔽。