※ 引述《hamasakiayu (ayumi)》之铭言：
: 如果有乳头解放的支持者
: 拍摄自己的未成年的女儿
: 将照片上传到FB上面
: 这个人在美国会不会出事呢？
: 美国佬开的FB又会做何反应呢？
: 从乳头解放的观点来看
: 只有男性可以上空，女性不行
: 并没有年纪的限制
: 公园的老阿伯，与儿童池的小男孩都是上空啊
: 所以放个公园的老阿嬷，与泳池的小女孩上空
: 对乳头解放运动也是很正常的呢？
An image is child pornography if it is a visual depiction of someone who
appears to be a minor (i.e., under 18 years old) engaged in sexually explicit
conduct (e.g., vaginal or anal intercourse,oral sex, bestiality or
masturbation as well as lascivious depictions of the genitals), or
sadistic or masochistic abuse.
An image of a naked child (e.g., in the bathtub or at a nudist
colony) is not considered child pornography as long as the child is not
engaging in sexually explicit conduct, or the focus is not on the child’s
genitalia. Visual depictions of adults who look like children (e.g., a 35
-year-old man play-acting in diapers, or an obvious woman dressed as a
school girl) are not child pornography. If you don't think it's a minor,
it probably isn't child pornography.
米国对Child porn的定义
基本上就是说
如果是正常的场合露点而且又没有过分强调该对象的性征
就没有关系
正当场所包含天体营 游泳池 浴室等
youtube上就有很多天体营幼女的影片 其实都没啥问题