[请益] narrowly rejected

楼主: agricultural (务农的)   2019-10-03 13:40:56
大家好
在这篇文章 https://tinyurl.com/y3rkrhep 中看到以下这段
Nonetheless, says Tench of the EIA, Namibia’s rhinos are at risk from
poaching, which has intensified since 2014. The proposal was narrowly
rejected in a 39-82 vote.
这个提案是“将southern white rhinos 从Appendix I 移至Appendix II”
请问为什么39-82 的投票数是narrowly rejected?
查了这个会议的议事规则(https://tinyurl.com/y2oqma98)
里面有写到2/3 是通过的标准
但以我的理解 此提案要通过
应该是需要得到同意票的2/3, 所以反对票略高于2/3 , 反而是被大力地反对了
所以无法理解这边使用narrowly rejected 的原因
请教大家的意见了
谢谢
补充议事规则:
Rule 28 Majority
1. Except where otherwise provided for under the provisions of the
Convention, these Rules or
the Terms of Reference for the Administration of the Trust Fund, all votes on
procedural matters
relating to the conduct of the business of the meeting shall be decided by a
simple majority of
the Representatives present and voting, while all other decisions shall be taken by a two-thirds
majority of Representatives present and voting.
作者: cuylerLin (cuylerLin)   2019-10-03 17:49:00
narrowly此处是指"惊险地"被反对了,总票数121,2/3需81票,但反对票只有82票,相当惊险
楼主: agricultural (务农的)   2019-10-03 18:29:00
照规则来说 即使是同意50比反对70 同意票也不到2/3这提案还是不会过不是吗
作者: cuylerLin (cuylerLin)   2019-10-03 18:34:00
这跟narrowly意思上逻辑没有矛盾阿,而且投票是反对议题,如果是50:70不会出现rejected这个字眼对我来说这里就只是要表达惊险被反对而已,被大力地反对应该是10:110之类的比数
楼主: agricultural (务农的)   2019-10-03 18:36:00
这样讲我比较能同意 rejected 只是一个总票数分布的展现 而不是对此提案通过与否的描述?50:70 跟35:85的票数 以结果来说都是一样的
作者: cuylerLin (cuylerLin)   2019-10-03 18:38:00
没错,而且如果是50:70的话,谁知道下次会不会被游说成
楼主: agricultural (务农的)   2019-10-03 18:38:00
好奇若是50:70的话 会怎么描述?

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com