基本上 NTSB 的前主任开砲不是没有理由，
因为其实这是有 ICAO 规范的，
我们的 ASC 也是依据 ICAO 规范作业。
其实各位去查 ASC 作业程序就知道，
一份调查报告完成时，其实他依据规定
涉及调查单位如下：
航空器登记国
航空公司国籍国
航空器设计国
航空器制造国
提供相关资讯或重大设施或专家的国家
国际民航组织。
所以衣航的案子很清楚，这个飞机
要送的飞安事故调查单位，至少会包含
1. 登记与航空公司国籍 -> 埃塞俄比亚调查单位
2. 设计与制造相关
(1) 机体设计与制造 -> 美国 NTSB
(2) 发动机(CFMI) -> NTSB / 法国BEA
3. 相关设施与制造
(AoA Sensor / MCAS 设计制造等等)
所以这个飞安调查照规范也会让 BEA参与，
你埃塞俄比亚故意不给 NTSB，说穿了就是
一个政治化的举动，而且不查明原因飞机
就是会被 Hold 在地上...
(虽然适航指令发布与调查未必有关就是)
至于有些人质疑是不是 NTSB 想护航，
我只能说大家不要被台湾这种动不动就
泛政治化的想法影响。 NTSB 在美国是
属于很独立的调查组织，波音的确是有
可能去影响 FAA 在适航指令发布的作为，
但是如果讲说 NTSB 会被波音影响，我
只能说这样其实太小看 NTSB 了
有关于人机冲突的调查，建议各位可以去
看日本看看 CI140 的调查，就会知道为何
NTSB 前主任要开这种砲
※ 引述《ttnakafzcm (灿's)》之铭言
: 昨天前NTSB调查主任 Greg Feith 开炮
: https://www.facebook.com/AirCrashDetective
: It is sad to hear some of the “junior investigator” talking heads make a
: storyline out of factoids or no facts about the 737 MAX. They embellish th
eir
: credentials to sound smart when in fact they have no clue and say things
: about analyzing data that doesn’t exist....
: A good friend of mine who is a former airline captain and flight safety
: professional ant be the following:
: “The VAST majority of the inane comments and knee jerk industry reactions
on
: FB and AV Herald are based on no valid nor substantiated information
: regarding the MAX aircraft.
: However, NO one is talking about the pilots, nor the airlines involved, no
r
: the training, nor the experience of the pilots. It IS WELL BEYOND time tha
t
: these direct factors are understood, investigated and considered a possibl
e
: contributor to the two distinct MAX accidents.
: The accident information in news articles dated 11/28/2018 indicated that
the
: previous crew at Lion Air had experienced the MCAS issue but CORRECTLY dea
lt
: with it by disconnecting the stab trim cutouts - as expected in the NNC
: (non-normal checklist) yet the accident crew could not figure it out. Why
the
: plane was dispatched in an unairworthy condition needs to be addressed and
: why one crew did and the accident crew did not figure it out the system
: issues needs to be explored because the deficiencies with the accident fli
ght
: crew can be traced back to inadequate or deficient training and like suspe
ct
: pilot qualifications!”
: I agree with the premise of his comments and would add that training issue
s
: should be a focal point of the Ethiopian MAX and Atlas Air accidents.
: Automation confusion and automation dependence are key factors that must b
e
: included in all three of the recent accidents.
: 这边的大概意思是
: 人们不应该单纯的把事故起因归咎于飞机本身的设计
: 而是要做综合考量 包含人为因素 也就是航空公司是否提供足够的训练及飞行员是否
: 充分的了解这些系统等等关键因素
: 接着今天接着开砲埃塞俄比亚当局
: What is going on with Aviation Safety? The Ethiopian government “shopped
: around” to find a country where the FDR and CVR would be sent because the
y
: decided that despite being the country of manufacturer, and having one of
the
: best FDR/CVR Labs, the NTSB would not read out the data. At a time when an
: airplane is under so much scrutiny regarding safety of flight issues, the
: Ethiopian government apparently did not feel a sense of urgency in obtaini
ng
: data that is vital to both Boeing and the FAA to determine the
: safety-critical issue(s) with either the airplane, the pilots, aircraft
: maintenance or a combination of all three.
: Instead of having critical information within hours, the aviation industry
: and the world are waiting days because the Ethiopian government was turned
: down by the UK and German investigative authorities and finally settled on
: the French BEA. Politics like this has no place in aviation safety.
: Now that the BEA (who also has a very good laboratory but are in the backy
ard
: of Airbus) has received the FDR and CVR, the next question is when will th
e
: data be available for analysis? Meanwhile the aviation industry and flying
: public waits, and the air carriers experience the economic impact!
: 飞机明明是美国做的 NTSB/FAA的设备最好你不找 偏偏跑去找法国
: 而且搞的全球MAX停飞陪你们耗