日本车网 Best Car Web报导
我看的是英文版
https://bestcarweb.jp/feature/column/884364
这次调查是丰田内部调查，自主提供报告
1) Data from airbag timer ignition is used to apply for certification of
minor change vehicles (2014 Crown/2015 Isis).
使用来自安全气囊点火计时器的数据申请小改款车辆的认证（2014 Crown/2015 Isis）。
2) Pedestrian protection tests are conducted at strict angles different
from regulations (2015 Corolla).
行人保护测试在不同于法规的严格角度下进行（2015 Corolla）。
3) The pedestrian protection test was conducted in a different location
from the left and right than the application (2015 Sienta & Crown)
行人保护测试在与申请不同的左右位置进行（2015 Sienta & Crown）。
4) The rear collision test was conducted using a truck 700 kg heavier than
the regulations (2014 Crown/2015 Sienta)
后碰撞测试使用比法规重700公斤的卡车进行（2014 Crown/2015 Sienta）。
5) A test was carried out by loading a baggage test block that was not
certified under the new regulations into the luggage compartment (current
model Yaris Cross)
在行李箱内进行未经新法规认证的行李测试块测试（现行款 Yaris Cross）。
6) Engine output was lower than the application content,
so a ROM tune was performed (2015 Lexus RX) 。
由于引擎输出低于申请内容，因此进行了ROM调校（2015 Lexus RX）。
丰田解释
1) is a minor change vehicle, and it has already been cleared at the time
of new vehicle registration. If that's the case, I don't think there will
be any problems with the safety of commercially available cars, since the
idea is to delay the deployment of the airbags in order to check seatbelt
performance. 2) and 4) are stricter conditions than specified by the Ministry
of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, so there is no need to worry.
Regarding 3), they are structurally the same. I should have stayed where I
applied. 5) The weights of the blocks are the same, so there is no
difference. 6) Part of the exhaust pipe of the engine used on the chassis
dynamo was crushed. Commercially available cars have been cleared.
#2 #4 是丰田内部的测试比法规还严
#1 车辆小改款时，沿用旧款气囊的数据没有重测
#3 受撞行人的位置有左右差异，但因为结构相同所以没重作
#5 用了新的同重量行李块，但这行李块当下还没有受到认证
#6 送测车因为排气管有变形数据不对，所以后续调整软件认证一致
所以，真正算是便宜行事的是#3...
但实际所有项目与驾驶与行车安全都无关
自主调查的结果这六项，各位怎么看？??