默默地占了8888的位子 XD
- Q: “Everybody knows that in 9.5, tanks will get a viewrange nerf…” A
(Storm): “Everybody knows, only I don’t know anything.”
Q:“大家都知道9.5要砍视距…”Storm:“就我一个人不知道。”
- apparently, IS-7 and IS-8 rear side armor are historical (they have correct
shape)
IS-7 和 IS-8 的后部装甲（形状）符合史实
- SerB confirms that it’s possible for a shell to pass through a hole, that
is smaller than its caliber in WoT, but: “Probability of that is somewhere
around 1 to 100k – we are ignoring that and will continue to ignore that.”
SerB 证实砲弹可以穿越直径小于其口径的洞，但“发生机率大概十万分之一，我们已经
并会持续忽略它。”
- Q: “Why do you want to nerf the viewrange of 300 vehicles for the sake of
5 tier 8 LT’s? It’s connected to the “war on TD’s” and bad arty nerf. I
propose: reduce team size to 12, hardcap arty to 2 per side and take half of
their shells away!” A: “Game design by players sucks. Instead of fixing the
respective parameter you propose to change the general game rules, after you
bash us for making too big changes. Logic, logic everywhere.” (SS: the
translation of the answer here is not literal, for example the first sentence
is actually a quote, that makes little sense in English. Was trying to keep
the point SerB made instead.)
Q:“为啥你们只为了五至八阶的轻坦就砍另外三百台车的视距？跟‘TD世界’和乱砍自走
砲脱不了关系。我建议：把每队人数降到十二人，限制单队砲车不多于两台并将携弹量减
半！”
A:“由玩家来设计游戏会搞砸。你在指责我们做大规模改动之后，反而建议将基本游戏规
则全部改写，而非更动相关参数而已？逻辑何在！”
（SS注：此处未照字面翻译；像是第一句原文是引用，翻成英文没有意义。试着抓住SerB
的原意。）
- T-44-85 and T-34-85M in the game? “When it’s done it’s done.”
T-44-85、T-34-85M “WIDID”
- Coated optics is active all the time, not only when the vehicle is moving
镀膜的效果是全程发动，不只有在移动中
- Q: “Enough with the “improving” of team battles!” A: “Well, that’s up
to you whether you have enough or not. Noone is keeping you here.”
Q:“对团队战斗的‘改进’已经受够了！”A:“嗯，够不够要看你。没人逼你玩它。”
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/16/16-11-2014/