- for now, amphibious tanks won’t be implemented
目前不会有两栖战车
- Cannoneer (a developer, responsible for historical tank research) states
that FV4202 can actually have the 105mm L7, as the 20pdr and 105mm L7 were
interchangeable (they used the same mount)
Cannoneer（一位研究战车历史的开发人员）表示 FV4202 其实可以装 105mm L7；因为
20磅砲和 L7 用相同砲架。
- RU251 dimensions compared to Leopard 1: 10 percent shorter, 8 percent
narrower and 14 percent lower (for hull only)
RU251 vs Leopard 1: 短 1/10、窄 8％、矮 14％（只计入车体）
- Leopard prototype cannot be a tier 8 premium tank according to developers,
because its every version has a 105mm gun
因为配备 105 砲，Leopard 原型车不可能当八阶金车
- IS-6 armor and maximum speed are historically correct, won’t be buffed
IS-6 的装甲和极速没错，不会buff
- IS-4 will not get S-34 (100mm) and S-34-2 (122mm) guns, that were used on
its prototypes. Cannoneer explains that the S-34 is basically the same as the
D-10T and the S-34-2 is practically equal to the D-25T
不会给 IS-4 S-34 (100mm)和 S-34-2 (122mm)这两门用在原型车上的砲。Cannoneer 解
释说 S-34 基本上跟 D-10T 相同，而 S-34-2 约等于 D-25T
- the unhistoricity of tanks in the game is relative according to developers:
some players claim that 70 percent of all tanks are “unhistorical” –
developers argue that this number could be brought to up to 100 percent,
since there is practically always an unhistorical element in some tanks (such
as maximum speed)
有些玩家声称有七成的车都不合史实。开发人员表示，要计较的话那全部的车都算；因为
每台车或多或少都有非史实的部份
- why was WT E-100 nerfed in second test? “Because reducing the number of
shells by 1 and buffing the magazine reload time made it even strunger. No
way we want that.”
为啥二测要再砍 WT E-100？“因为就算弹匣扣掉一发，buff装填速度反而让它更恶心了”
- the fact that tanks need rebalance every now and than is normal: “If it
ever stops, it means we closed the project. Every online project has constant
rebalancing. Sometimes only a small one, but every project. There is no ideal
balance in the world.”
持续进行平衡很正常
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/19/19-7-2014/
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/20/20-7-2014/
开 T-25 连进七阶场…换开玛蒂达，连进六阶场…再换 T2 LT，又进四阶场…
……我踩到MM娘的尾巴了吗…