另回一篇有人说资料没正确性 (也没说那里错??)
就简单随便看一下这篇文章说的一小小点
※ 引述《xross (xross)》之铭言：
"Rebuilding the Racket Compiler with Chez Scheme"
https://blog.lambdaclass.com/rebuilding-the-racket-compiler-with-chez-scheme/
网上资料挺丰富的 我觉得不难找 例如这篇长文说 Chez Scheme 超快没对手
"Chez Scheme's biggest claim to fame is its performance. It has always been
among the best-performing Scheme implementations."
"Its performance has no match among other schemes and it has a long history
of being used in production."
然后我们看到网络上有人22年中又做了一次测试
https://ecraven.github.io/r7rs-benchmarks/
https://i.imgur.com/7LrnyMq.jpeg 截图
注意
chez-9.5.5-m64 也就是 Chez Scheme
racket-8.5/r7rs 也就是上面那篇长文说 racket 要重搞 基于 Chez Scheme
petite-9.5.5-m64 以前 Chez Scheme (快版)要卖钱时 免费试用迷你基本(慢)版
mit-11.2 mit-scheme
根据截图右半边 结果57种测试 mit通过52项 Chez相关的3种版本皆通过57项测试
根据截图左半边 Chez Scheme 有最多第一名 迷你基本版一般 但也有几个第三名
所以我觉得这篇访谈长文绝对不是一句不可信可以打死的 供参
"mit-scheme is one of the best (and oldest) scheme implementations, but day by
day it is more and more clear that it is slowly sinking into oblivion."
https://www.reddit.com/r/scheme/comments/x9puwq/