Re: [情报] ETS官方网站台湾考场分类

楼主: yoyoyoII (就是阿佑)   2018-08-22 00:22:14
感谢J 大分享,这事件真的可能会影响申请者的权益,
小弟不才,请教完老师后,也写了一封信寄给ETS ,
信也寄到ETS 总部和发言人的两个信箱,欢迎大家复制信件内容一起寄,
虽然希望不大,但该发声就该发声!
收件者:
[email protected]
[email protected]
主旨:
Regarding the change from "Taiwan" to "Taiwan, China" on the ETS website
内文:
To whom it may regard at ETS:
We are more than 5,000 students who plan to/are taking TOEFL this
year. A few days ago, we noticed that on the ETS website, “Taiwan
” has been changed to “Taiwan, China” in both the nationality
column upon registering for a test and in the address section. We
find this change really disappointing and firmly believe that this
is against the values ETS strives to protect. Therefore, we, the
test-takers from Taiwan, strongly urge ETS to change the
nationality back to “Taiwan” only, or to “Taiwan, R.O.C” as
that is what is shown on our passport.
While we appreciate the effort ETS has spent on improving testing,
teaching and learning, we think it is essential that the nonprofit
ETS fights back on threats or temptations to alter the pre-
existing “Taiwan” nationality, for the action steers away from
ETS’ mission to “advance quality and equity in education for all
people worldwide”. We the Taiwanese test-takers firmly believe
that with “Taiwan, China” shown on our transcript, ETS not only
denies the diverse student background it acknowledges and
respects, but deprives the Taiwanese students of the chance to be
seen as different from the Chinese students by universities and
graduate schools we wish to apply for. Born and raised in Taiwan,
we find our life stories very different from the Chinese
applicants and consider it essential to emphasize the diversity we
can bring to the foreign institutions we are applying for, and
thus, we strongly urge ETS to change our nationality back to “
Taiwan” only.
For the past years, most of the Taiwanese test-takers prefer TOEFL
to IETLS. However, the sudden change of “Taiwan” to “Taiwan,
China” seems to us antithetical to the values that ETS as a
nonprofit should protect and also steers away from what form the
cornerstones of both U.S. and Taiwan’s democracy. This change
then has to deal with the full force of the Taiwanese test-takers
and perhaps even the foreign institutions we wish to apply for.
More than 5,000 of the Taiwanese test-takers this year and in the
years to come might change our minds to take IELTS instead, as
IELTS still lists “Taiwan” as a nation on its website and on its
transcript. We have also started writing to schools we wish to
apply for, complaining about this change and asking the admission
committees to value IETLS scores more. To avoid this action
turning into a movement, once again, we suggest ETS to change “
Taiwan, China” back to “Taiwan” only.
All in all, we don’t see ETS’ concerns and action being
legitimate in this case, and we not only urge ETS to put “Taiwan
” back on its website, but ask for an explanation to why this
action has been taken. We strongly feel that only by listing “
Taiwan” as a nation on the ETS website, can ETS live up to its
mission to “advance quality and equity in education for all
people worldwide”, and can it win continuous support from the
Taiwanese test-takers as well as the schools from around the
world.
建议大家点下方的网页版连结,以方便复制,
寄出后应该会收到ETSinfo 寄来的48 hr 内回复通知,大家一起捍卫权益吧!
作者: beargood718 (那我懂你意思ㄌ)   2018-08-22 00:32:00
推,马上寄
作者: mooncatQ (猫咪蚊子 嗡嗡嗡~ 喵)   2018-08-22 03:17:00
推!
作者: uuxx66 (uuxx66)   2018-08-22 08:48:00
推 已寄
作者: death19407 (Nao)   2018-08-22 09:07:00
推 !! 另外这写作有30分吧XD
作者: ooohooorange (喔耶)   2018-08-22 09:51:00
推!
作者: liondoll (JOSH)   2018-08-22 13:06:00
推!
作者: brendenPTT (欧美)   2018-08-22 15:09:00
已寄 希望有好消息
作者: victor65327 (victor65327)   2018-08-22 16:00:00
已寄!推推
作者: wenst98 (小雨)   2018-08-22 18:22:00
作者: brandneworld   2018-08-22 19:13:00
作者: gw18 (自由高飞)   2018-08-23 01:36:00
作者: Anchorites (隐客士)   2018-08-23 02:20:00
觉得有点长...
作者: cysteine (data)   2018-08-23 19:48:00
感谢分享!我自己是在收到系统自动回复的信件后,也有收到一位 Carol 小姐的来信,说她已经将讯息转交权责单位,将会有相关人员进一步联络。小小澄清一下喔,那个 [email protected] 是华府办公室的信箱。ETS 的总部在纽泽西,但是网站上找不到总部的信箱。其实 ETS 网站上也有他们发言人和企业的Twitter帐号。我是有点犹豫要不要 tweet 他们啦,毕竟 tweet 比 email 公开,要是没什么回响,好像没什么用;但万一回响太大(例如,引来一些 trolls 造成不必要的困扰或纷争…)可能也事倍功半。大家觉得呢?
作者: death19407 (Nao)   2018-08-23 20:47:00
回楼上 我觉得下面100%会吵起来XD
作者: theone21cent (蓝羽飘杀)   2018-08-24 00:15:00
推!!捍卫自己的权利

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com