※ 引述《NKN (99%是眼镜与吐槽)》之铭言：
: 不知道这教授用来参考的28场海战是哪几场
原始文章为Bigger Fleets Win
https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2023/january/bigger-fleets-win
28场海战参考表如下
https://i.imgur.com/NTYSpVJ.jpg
海军以小胜大只有三次：
拜占庭-维京/斯拉夫/阿拉伯人
葡萄牙-马穆鲁克/土耳其
英国-其他
I’ve heard a lot of people saying recently, ‘Quantity has a quality all its
own.’ And I just want to be clear: No, it doesn’t.
..not only does quantity have a quality all its own, but it also almost always
proves decisive in naval warfare when professional competence is equal.
数量不仅仅能代表素质
并在双方素质相当时 扮演决定性的角色
When professional naval competence and strategic acumen were equal, the
larger fleet usually won, even when the smaller fleet possessed technological
advantages at the start of the conflict.
A primary reason is that technological advantages were inevitably short-lived.
即使较小的舰队在技术上有优势
最终往往仍是较大的舰队获得胜利
因技术优势的时间往往很短暂
Inspired by Professor Hughes’ work, my decades of research have brought me
to this conclusion: In a naval struggle between near-peers, mass (numbers),
and the ability to replace losses bests technological advantage.
教授的研究指出 实力相当的海军
数量和弥补损失的能力 胜过 技术优势
有趣的观点 大家可以看看