※ 引述《hvariables (Speculative Male)》之铭言：
: 原文来源：
: https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/4128027
: 原文摘要：
: 找到证据了！北溪漏气证实遭蓄意破坏
: 2022/11/18 20:18
: https://img.ltn.com.tw/Upload/business/page/800/2022/11/18/php4jKFQT.jpg
: 根据最新调查结果指出，北溪漏气确实是遭到人为蓄意破坏。（美联社）
: 〔财经频道／综合报导〕1名瑞典检察官周五（18日）表示，调查人员在受损的北溪天然
: 气管道中，发现了可以证实人为蓄意破坏管道的关键性证据。
自由时报下方予以加色的原报导文字的那一段，记者是从哪看来的“哪个路透社”内容去
用暗示带风向？谁给你“也就是说”云云？有阅读敏锐度的人会奇怪这句十足硬插进来的
句子。
有涉猎过新闻写作的人，就知道哪个正规（尤其是有公信力的外国）媒体在报导（而不是
评论特稿）中来一句这个“解读”用语？
《路透》报导，瑞典及丹麦当局此前正调查连接俄罗斯和德国的天然气管道北溪1号、2号
，由于管道上突然出现的4个破洞，刚好正值欧洲天然气供应短缺，使得该事件有可能成
为加深乌克兰危机的导火线，也就是说有人试图加深俄罗斯与欧洲之间的矛盾。
自由时报（自由的这篇新闻竟然不敢署名！）是英文太烂看不懂原文而难道是从中国网站
抄中文翻译版新闻吗？怎犯如此造谣的疏失！还刻意暗示炮制一个“俄罗斯”、“欧洲”
以外的第三国有嫌疑（换言之俄罗斯既然是某嫌疑国要借由北溪爆炸案打击的目标，俄罗
斯就被排除在爆炸案的作案嫌疑名单了）？
https://0rz.tw/4Zm46 至少以我找到的路透社关于瑞典丹麦证实北溪一、二号破坏事件。
他X的我眼睛看到脱窗也没看到在其他中规中矩的事实报导写作句子之外，有横柴入灶的
那句暗示瑞典、丹麦当局仿佛作证“（也就是）说”俄罗斯被排除嫌疑、而是某个第三国
阴谋要在俄罗斯与欧洲之间制造矛盾的造谣句子。然后看到某些黄鹅网友见到此新闻的兴
奋貌，真是（经由自由日报的偷懒失职导致的）协同认知作战啊！
不信邪的网友自己去看完我下方复制的路透社报导全部英文句子就知道了。
Nord Stream leaks confirmed as sabotage, Sweden says
By Anna Ringstrom and Terje Solsvik
STOCKHOLM, Nov 18 (Reuters) - Investigators have found traces of explosives
at the site of the damaged Nord Stream gas pipelines, confirming sabotage had
taken place, a Swedish prosecutor said on Friday.
Swedish and Danish authorities are investigating four holes in the Nord
Stream 1 and 2 pipelines which link Russia and Germany via the Baltic Sea and
have become a flashpoint in the Ukraine crisis as gas supplies in Europe run
short.
Denmark last month said a preliminary investigation had shown that the leaks
were caused by powerful explosions.
"Analysis that has now been carried out shows traces of explosives on several
of the objects that were recovered," the Swedish Prosecution Authority said
in a statement, adding that the findings establish the incident as "gross
sabotage".
It said the continued probe would determine whether it would be possible to
identify those responsible.
Cooperation with authorities in Sweden as well as in other countries was
going very well, lead prosecutor Mats Ljungqvist said.
The prosecutor's office declined to give further comment, including on which
explosives were believed to have been used to damage the pipelines.
Russia will wait until a full damage assessment is done before deciding on
repairs, if any, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Friday.
"The very fact that data has already begun to come in, in favour of
confirming a subversive act or a terrorist act... once again confirms the
information that the Russian side has," Peskov told his daily call with
reporters.
"It is very important not to stop, it is very important to find the one
behind this explosion."
Neither Gazprom (GAZP.MM), nor the Nord Stream 1 and 2 replied to Reuters
requests for comment.
Seismologists in Denmark and Sweden previously said they had registered
tremors in the immediate vicinity of the leaks and that the signals did not
resemble those from earthquakes.
Danish police declined to comment on the Swedish findings.
The Sept. 26 ruptures of the seabed pipelines, spewing gas into the ocean
that bubbled to the surface in the week that followed, triggered warnings of
public hazard and fears of environmental damage.
A section measuring at least 50 metres (164 feet) is missing from Nord Stream
1, Swedish daily Expressen reported on Oct. 18 after filming what it said
were the first publicly released images of the damage.
Russia's defence ministry last month said that British navy personnel blew up
the pipelines, a claim that London said was false and designed to distract
from Russian military failures in Ukraine.
以上。试问不信邪的网友，英文原句哪一行有自由时报脑补的“也就是说”的部份？
ps.“俄国”在上方英文最后一段固然指控譬如英国炸的，然而俄国立场这大家早就知道。
关键是路透社原文可没说瑞典、丹麦给你来一个“也就是说”好吗！自由时报别把俄国的
观点塞在瑞典、丹麦当局的观点后方来混淆视听，让读者以为瑞典、丹麦也这么认为。
ps.军事点可能还是在战略面。北溪一、二号一共四条管线，依照原先俄国跟西方诸国的
供气合约，俄国其实不能无故不提供合约规定的供气数量，不然很简单：违约->赔钱（耍
赖不赔？那么就授西方以柄自绝于西方，虽说俄国不是绝不这么做，但要“那么早”全面
撕破脸吗？待深究）。但是“有故”（譬如管线因为不是俄方责任的相关事故而损毁）就
可以达到让西方相关签约国在冬天缺少天然气供暖，而有可能有要该国政府不再管乌国的
民意了。
此外依照譬如徐某人的分析，四条管线是被炸了三条，恰恰留下一条！因为如果真是四条
全炸了，反而让西方诸国断了念想，干脆一条路走到底帮乌国（因为反正帮也好不帮也好
，都已经“完全没有”北溪的气可用，不帮乌国也不会因此“变出”俄国的天然气来），
如果是英美要断掉俄国对西方诸国的最大影响力因素断得干干净净，应该北溪四条全炸。
反而，炸三条留一条，其实是俄国得利：才“既能”让西方民众冷到，但“又能”靠手中
仍有的一条当筹码，诱使西方民众是否出于短视（不要连这一条，都可能因为本国继续跟
俄国全面撕破脸，而停供）而逼政府减少支援乌国，这样俄国就得利、俄军就多一分或许
（普丁认为的）击败乌军的可能性。这是对英美与俄国行为选择的rational的分析。
以上是以战略素养而能第一时间看出自由时报的中文稿不对劲。
: 瑞典检察机关声明表示，透过目前的分析显示，在找到的几件物品上发现了爆炸物痕迹，
: 根据调查结果，已将该事件定调为“严重破坏”，将透过持续调查以查明是否有人该为此
: 负责。
: 俄罗斯发言人Dmitry Peskov表示，俄罗斯将等到管道全面损害评估完成后，再决定是否
: 进行修复。“证据逐渐浮出水面，这种恐怖行动再次验证了俄罗斯所掌握到的消息”、“
: 不能停下来，找到这场爆炸背后的幕后黑手很重要”。
: 心得感想：
: 新闻报导瑞典检察官表示发现了可以证实人为蓄意破坏北溪天然管道的关键性证据，
: 其实要猜是哪个国家破坏北溪天然管道不会很难，
: 不过那个国家可能会想一堆歪理把责任推给其他国家。