http://tinyurl.com/7zbzaca
"At the American Sports Medicine Institute's course on injuries in baseball
last January, Will Carroll and I presented research from the last decade
arguing that there was virtually no correlation between average pitch counts
and days lost to injury for pitchers. Other speakers touched on similar
ideas, noting that once a pitcher's arm is fully developed, pitch counts were
no longer a good way of measuring fatigue.
作者:
Vinsanity (Gotvinsanity)
2012-05-15 09:25:00B
作者:
JJay ( 绝体绝命委员会)
2012-05-15 09:27:00A
作者:
Mooooose (养乐多'牛丼'披萨'笋干)
2012-05-15 09:37:00我好想嘘
作者:
YU0987 (玉™你就白吃)
2012-05-15 09:42:00M.Prior与K.Wood表示:
作者:
fetoyeh (小叶)
2012-05-15 09:43:00贝克SU
作者:
titti (安馒)
2012-05-15 09:44:00C
作者:
saidon ( )
2012-05-15 09:47:00still sucks
作者:
ddtcd (专注)
2012-05-15 09:48:00Robb Nen表示:
作者: lolity 2012-05-15 09:48:00
这么喜欢引战只好给嘘了。
这篇文章的主旨应该是说,不能纯粹用球数来判断投手是否会受伤
找了其中一篇原文paper翻了一下,是说球数跟投手的表现
关系很小,用球数作为判断投手疲累的依据显得有些粗糙
作者: beareyes (熊眼) 2012-05-15 13:02:00
球数影响小会不会是因为现在普遍都有在控制球数
作者: beareyes (熊眼) 2012-05-15 13:03:00
所以差距不大,如果场场150+操,影响可能会比较明显?
用球数跟休息天数也不仅仅只是怕受伤吧 还有压制力考量
作者:
Yukirin (いい天気!)
2012-05-15 13:34:00傻的 内生性不懂喔
作者:
hinenak (Flaming June)
2012-05-15 14:29:00二话不说,照样贝克街
作者:
tunababy (相信妳自己,真的....)
2012-05-15 14:29:00这篇没有讲很清楚,可能要去看原来的文章才行
作者:
Kouzuki (フェリさまのしもべ)
2012-05-15 14:52:00的亡灵