Pitching Mechanics Analysis Michael Pineda

楼主: abc12812   2012-03-31 15:57:58
作者把Pineda归类到有明显问题和伤病风险的那区
http://tinyurl.com/7tjclqo
There has been extensive discussion among Yankee fans about whether new
Yankee pitcher Michael Pineda has the Inverted W or not. The bottom line on
Michael Pineda's pitching mechanics is that I do not see the Inverted W in
Michael Pineda's pitching mechanics, but I do see some things that concern me.
First, Michael Pineda doesn't have a classic Inverted W. While his elbows do
get a bit high, it's borderline at best.
You can see some hints of a timing problem in the two pictures above, and in
the picture directly above in particular. The thing to notice is how Michael
Pineda's arm is passing through 90 degrees of external rotation but his glove
side elbow has pulled back significantly and his shoulders have rotated
significantly. That suggests that his arm is a bit late.
You can see the same thing in the pictures above of Michael Pineda; notice
how his Pitching Arm Side (PAS) forearm is vertical and at 90 degrees of
external rotation and his Glove Side (GS) elbow is well behind his back. That
is often an indication of a timing problem.
However, what Michael Pineda does isn't as drastic as what Stephen Strasburg
does; notice how much later Stephen Strasburg's PAS forearm is. Strasburg's
PAS forearm is closer to horizontal whereas Michael Pineda's PAS forearm is
closer to vertical, which is a significant difference.
What concerns me the most about Michael Pineda's arm action is that he seems
to show the ball to Center Field. Many people teach this, but it's both
unnecessary and potentially injurious.
If you look at high speed clips of Michael Pineda, you can see his PAS
forearm rotate around at the last second as gets his hand into position to
throw the ball. That late torqueing can create a timing problem and can
increase the load on both the elbow and the shoulder.
In the high-speed clip above, notice how he shows the ball to Center Field
and how this causes his arm to be late and appears to create a timing
problem. He also does all of this with his PAS elbow quite high, and possibly
above the level of his shoulders in a position of Hyperabduction.
作者: charlie01   2012-03-31 16:01:00
风险不小这大家都知道 但有没发生其实就是一翻两瞪眼..
作者: lovejeely (Wedge Sucks!)   2012-03-31 16:02:00
Lincecum的投球机制,不是也被归类成风险很高那一型?
楼主: abc12812   2012-03-31 16:03:00
按作者的归类 盲肠的机制是大体上良好但有点小瑕疵那类
作者: lovejeely (Wedge Sucks!)   2012-03-31 16:04:00
了解
楼主: abc12812   2012-03-31 16:04:00
其实我是不太相信倒W之类的这套啦 只是刚好看到了就
楼主: abc12812   2012-03-31 16:05:00
贴上来分享一下
作者: ankero (pythoning)   2012-03-31 16:23:00
这作者写得东西很有意思喔 我觉得有点道理
作者: sky419012 (fly)   2012-03-31 17:00:00
请问倒W跟W的投球姿势差在哪吗?
作者: sky419012 (fly)   2012-03-31 17:01:00
我只记得小史和之前小熊的Prior好像是倒W的样子...
作者: oralboralb ( )   2012-03-31 17:28:00
Verlander好像是W的样子,投球超协调又轻松
作者: conjohn (conjohn)   2012-03-31 17:50:00
影片中看起来手的确有过慢的问题 影片看起对肩膀和手肘的都很大
作者: conjohn (conjohn)   2012-03-31 17:51:00
负担
作者: FatBearInn (FBI胖熊旅店)   2012-03-31 18:34:00
我有个很小的问题..为什么倒W不叫作M型就好,是因为
作者: FatBearInn (FBI胖熊旅店)   2012-03-31 18:35:00
正常的投球机制是W型吗?
作者: FatBearInn (FBI胖熊旅店)   2012-03-31 18:43:00
啊,找到解释倒W的文章了,是这样没错
作者: ankero (pythoning)   2012-03-31 18:59:00
有肩或肘伤的投手 与倒W的投球机制有密切关系
作者: skcwebb (anthoNY)   2012-03-31 22:13:00
为何要讲倒W不讲M?
作者: o0991758566 (洨马力)   2012-03-31 22:29:00
Lincecum是个怪咖,不能以常理判断
作者: BMHSEA (Ciao)   2012-03-31 22:55:00
倒w 和M长得不一样啊...
作者: borriss (松)   2012-04-01 00:57:00
真的用M那个角度 会伤更快吧...
作者: Hans14 (沉默反对派)   2012-04-01 01:32:00
http://tinyurl.com/84qdhjj 看起来这球员就属于左侧那型
作者: Hans14 (沉默反对派)   2012-04-01 13:32:00
作者: lolity   2012-04-01 23:46:00
因为“标准”的姿势是W(ex.Maddux),所以称不标准姿势为倒W

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com