https://bit.ly/2SIIp2Q
这个 google sheet 有整理之前 AMA 中关于审核标准的讨论，
不确定时可以参考看看
※ 引述《Alex94140 (恶贯满盈的智障)》之铭言：
: 各位版上的大大大家好，小蓝我最近刚上12等（其实已经13等了ㄏㄏ），开始用OPR系统也
: 有一段时间了，前前后后也审了六七百座塔，不过对于一些候选还是有些疑问，看到外国
: 的探员们都会在reddit上讨论一些判例，所以想说在这里问问大家的意见。以下是我常见
: 的几种疑问：
: 1. 中小学的“周边装饰”：例如围墙上的装置艺术、校门之类的。
: 我觉得这类东西应该不会违背官方“不要擅闯中小学校园”的要求，但是我家附近国小
: 校门口的装置艺术就被官方活生生的拔掉了，想要问问各位认为官方的立场应该是…？
W7Q14: Vandré Brunazo - Portals that are outside of a school. ie the
school's wall graffiti, or school logo. Players don't need to go into the
school and bother students. Approve or or reject?
W7A14: If they are on school grounds I would reject.
只要摸到学校的边都算一星
: 2. “花草树木”的说明牌：例如只有写“白千层”的一个木制立牌，没有额外装饰。
: 这类东西在目前的portal网络里到处都是，大概是因为指引里说“用来指示自然景物的
: 候选应予以通过”，不过我个人认为这类东西看起来就一般般，所以在审核的时候就是
: 给低分啦～
Simple wooden markers are not good candidates; preferentially submit trail
markers with name/description of trail
如果没什么设计就给一星
: 3. 彩绘电箱：恩，我想在座的各位都知道我在说什么……
: 稍微了解ingress发展的人应该都知道这台湾特产的由来，不过那都是以前资源贫乏的
: 时代造就的产物了，现在应该是不用给过了吧？应该是吧？不过如果是偏乡的话各位会
: 通融吗？
偏乡的话，有人在问题中有提到:
Q11: Stuart C. - In OPR, I’ve heard people interpret the “give lenience to
portal spares areas when evaluation submissions” to also mean to be very
strict in areas with portals. Some only give 4 or 3 stars to submissions
that would be a suggested 5 star because there are portals near it. Should
we abide by the guidelines for denser areas or is it better to only give 3/4
stars to these portals?
A11: NIA OPS says, “Each Portal should be evaluated on its own merit without
taking into account the density of the location. There are a few exceptions
for locations with low density that's mentioned in the Guide
(https://opr.ingress.com/guide). “
但上面连结只有:
纪念台/纪念长椅
消防部门( 候选塔在低密度地区且不阻碍紧急车辆的路径。)
高速公路休息区(接受: 在低密度区域且有特色或便利设施。)
而在另一个问题又提到:
Q38: Joe R. - It's often been said that portals should be judged more
leniently in a lower density area. Should this apply to a large portal
sparse park or hiking trail located in the middle of an otherwise average
density area?
Density leniency varies by area - provide more specifics for a specific answer
感觉官方对这点也没定论?
: 4. 金炉：寺庙旁的附属物，烧金纸的那种。
: 通常离寺庙很近，所以理论上视为寺庙的一部分而标示为重复应该是合理的，不过我个
: 人还是会给高分，不知道各位怎么想？
W15Q42: Leandro Quevedo - Hello Andrew. I have a question about the opr and
the option to create new portals. In my town there is a church that got a lot
of statues of saints (picture below) everyone it is different from the
others, and we don't know if we could submit and the same for approves. I'm
not saying sending the 100 statues. But a lot of them are really good ones.
Well, hope your answer to share with the community. greetings from Argentina
A42: Yep these can be separate Portals. Whether they go live depends on the
votes they receive in OPR and whether they are too close to one another.
以教堂来对比的话，应该是有特色的东西就能过
: 5. 招牌：商店招牌之类的。
: 虽然指引里有说“具当地特色的企业应予以通过”，不过我怎么知道有没有“当地特色
: ”啊？这时候往往只能靠交上来的描述判断了，不过很多人就是懒得写描述，所以我就
: 常常不给过啦（除非招牌做的很有设计性），各位觉得呢？
: 以上就是我常常见到较有争议性的候选塔，想到再补吧（或再发一篇赚P币ㄏㄏ），欢迎大
: 家讨论囉～