或许有点晚了…
这个是欧盟压力测试报告
http://goo.gl/9nadwi
这个是针对报告的同侪审核(peer review)
http://goo.gl/zx6Mye
审查结果的内容主要还是针对一些抵御极端气候跟天然灾害所该增加的防范措施，还有原
能会所提出的改善…
但反核团体却找来这个欧妲贝克Oda Becker对压力测试报告下评论，崭钉截铁地说“建议
终止核四厂计划并且不让核四厂运转”，这版本也是被广为流传的评论。
http://goo.gl/p55aqz
再看看欧妲贝克的资历吧，她真的是核能专家吗?
．Professor at the University of Applied Science and Arts, Hanover;
freelance scientific consultant for energy and the environment;
应用科学教授
．studied physics and education science at the University of Hanover.
大学主修物理与科学教育
．working as an independent scientific consultant in the field of nuclear
safety and security for many years.
长期担任核安顾问
clients include the Austrian Federal Government as well as NGOs.
Recent work includes:
她的研究报告都只是一些大学程度的投影片
Studies of the hazards of spent fuel cask storage facilities; studies of the
vulnerability of the German NPP to terror attacks;
studies of the ongoing dangers of NPP in the 21st century;
study of the situation at the NPP Chernobyl site.
这是其中一份关于核电厂面对天然灾害可能发生的危险
http://goo.gl/Niwlaz
这是另一篇针对瑞典的核能压力测试所做的评论：http://goo.gl/AuVRkb
她的结论也一样是必须立即中止并永久停止运转。
这里有她对欧洲各国核电厂的评论…
http://goo.gl/iwBSc5
我举出一段好了，就知道她的报告有多不专业，根本在唬人
“Many operators do not consider the risk of an airplane crash because of the
low likelihood of such
an event. The scenario should not be excluded, however. An airplane crash
must be considered as
a relevant safety issue, because such a crash could result in major disaster.
”多数的核安皆不将飞机撞击事故网入考量…怎么不干脆说这些核电厂都没有核弹防护措
施? 最好中共飞弹打过来时还能升起防护罩…
结果我们的核四就要因为这样的人说的话要停建了…