Re: [新闻] WHO独立小组:中国发生大规模的疫情隐匿

楼主: fw190a (las)   2021-01-19 10:42:02
※ 引述《Fujiwarano (独孤浪客号:)》之铭言:
: 直指,中国和WHO在疫情暴发初期原本可以采取比较迅速的行动、实施更强而有力的公共
: 卫生措施,来避免灾难,但令人遗憾的是“大规模的疫情隐匿,助长了武汉肺炎蔓延全球
: ”。
https://reurl.cc/5oogny
直接用简体中文版转换对照看好了
What is clear to the Panel is that public health measures could have been
applied more forcefully by local and national health authorities in China in
January.It is also clear to the Panel that there was evidence of cases in a
number of countries by the end of January 2020. Public health containment
measures should have been implemented immediately in any country with
a likely case. They were not. According to the information analysed by the
Panel, the reality is that only a minority of countries took full advantage
of the information available to them to respond to the evidence of an
emerging epidemic.
30. 小组清楚的看到,中国的地方和国家卫生部门本可以在 1 月更有力地实施公共卫生
措施。小组也很清楚,到 2020 年 1 月底,有证据表明一些国家出现了病例。任何出现
可能病例的国家当时都应该立即实施公共卫生控制措施。但现实并非如此。根据小组分
析的信息,实际情况是,只有少数国家充分利用了获得的信息,对出现流行病的证据作
出反应。
隔了很远的一段
In retrospect, it is clear that the volume of infections in the early period
of the epidemic in all countries was higher than reported. A largely hidden
epidemic contributed to the global spread
27.回顾过去,很清楚的是,所有国家在疫情初期的感染人数均高于报告的数量。一种
非常隐蔽的流行病造成了全球传播
好像没有转弯,只是记者正常发挥。
另外IPPR这个独立小组跟现在在中共调查的小组是两个不同东西。
所以后续还可以看看会说出啥。
作者: lingsk (尘俗过隙)   2021-01-19 10:49:00
不同?
作者: ctw01 (0000)   2021-01-19 10:54:00
根本不可能查出来什么证据源头,就算有中国早就销毁了
作者: yuinghoooo (KiXeon)   2021-01-19 11:24:00
那也要给个说法啊
作者: Nazion95 (Akira)   2021-01-19 11:39:00
基本上就2%大内宣啊 笑死 到时候又要怪外国抵制不力 可是别人读的原文就不是内宣加料版 我看最后他们又要给自己冠上反共先锋的威名

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com