※ 引述《franz10123 (koenig7)》之铭言：
: https://zenodo.org/record/4028830
:
: 连登已经热烈讨论中了，台湾这边似乎还没什么人注意，据说刚刚发布网站就被DDoS中
: 无重大八卦请勿使用此分类，否则视同滥用爆卦闹板(文章退回、水桶6个月)
: 未满30繁体中文字 水桶3个月
至少也翻译一下摘要吧？
由新型冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2引起的COVID-19大流行已在全球造成91万人死亡，对全球
经济造成前所未有的严重破坏。尽管具有巨大的影响，SARS-CoV-2的起源仍然是神祕的和
有争议的。自然起源理论虽然被广泛接受，但缺乏实质性的支持。然而，另一种认为病毒
可能来自研究实验室的理论受到同侪评审的科学期刊的严格审查。尽管如此，SARS-CoV-2
显示了与自然发生的人畜共患病毒不一致的生物学特性。在这份报告中，我们描述了基因
组，结构，医学和文献证据，当一起考虑时，强烈地反对自然起源理论。证据表明，
SARS-CoV-2应该是使用蝙蝠冠状病毒ZC45和/或ZXC21作为模板和/或主干的实验室产物。
基于这些证据，我们进一步假设了SARS-CoV-2的合成途径，证明了在实验室中制造这种冠
状病毒是方便的，可以在大约6个月内完成。我们的工作强调了对相关研究实验室进行独
立调查的必要性。它还主张对最近发表的某些数据进行批判性调查，这些数据虽然有问题
，但被用来支持和声称SARS-CoV-2的天然来源。从公共卫生的角度来看，这些行动是必要
的，因为了解SARS-CoV-2的起源以及病毒如何进入人类群体，对于从根本上控制COVID-19
大流行以及预防今后类似的大流行至关重要。
摘要在下面，翻译在上面：
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has led to
over 910,000 deaths worldwide and unprecedented decimation of the global
economy. Despite its tremendous impact, the origin of SARS-CoV-2 has remained
mysterious and controversial. The natural origin theory, although widely
accepted, lacks substantial support. The alternative theory that the virus
may have come from a research laboratory is, however, strictly censored on
peer-reviewed scientific journals. Nonetheless, SARS-CoV-2 shows biological
characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring, zoonotic
virus. In this report, we describe the genomic, structural, medical, and
literature evidence, which, when considered together, strongly contradicts
the natural origin theory. The evidence shows that SARS-CoV-2 should be a
laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45 and/or ZXC21 as a
template and/or backbone. Building upon the evidence, we further postulate a
synthetic route for SARS-CoV-2, demonstrating that the laboratory-creation of
this coronavirus is convenient and can be accomplished in approximately six
months. Our work emphasizes the need for an independent investigation into
the relevant research laboratories. It also argues for a critical look into
certain recently published data, which, albeit problematic, was used to
support and claim a natural origin of SARS-CoV-2. From a public health
perspective, these actions are necessary as knowledge of the origin of
SARS-CoV-2 and of how the virus entered the human population are of pivotal
importance in the fundamental control of the COVID-19 pandemic as well as in
preventing similar, future pandemics.