※ 引述《startwinkle (星烁)》之铭言：
呃，与其看这种乱七八糟的伪科学，倒不如看一下论文数据
既然疾管署都挑明说这次的策略是参考加拿大，看一下加拿大修改“五年内无男性间性行
为者得捐血”(5-year deferral policy) 的说法
《Donor criteria for men who have sex with men: a Canadian perspective》
An updated risk modeling study using actual error rates at Canadian Blood
Services and Héma-Québec found that the incremental risk associated with a
5-year deferral for MSM was less than 1 infected HIV unit entering the blood
supply in 1000 years.
在实施五年缓捐策略的情况下，让受到爱滋病毒感染的血液进入血品供应系统的风险，一
千年下来也累积不到一单位；事实上，加拿大在实施五年缓捐策略三年后，已经改为实施
一年缓捐策略
再看一个美国食品药物管理局，经过十多年专家会议分析论文及各国政策后的建议
《Revised Recommendations for Reducing the Risk of Human Immunodeficiency
Virus Transmission by Blood and Blood Products》
During the five years before and five years after a change from a lifetime
deferral to a one-year deferral in Australia, there was no change in risk to
the blood supply, defined by the number of HIV positive donations per year
and the proportion of HIV-positive donors with male-to-male sex as a risk
factor.
比较澳洲实施一年缓捐策略的前后五年，并没有导致血品危险性上升
如果有更改捐血策略造成血品危险性上升的论文欢迎提出，那种反智的脑补麻烦省省