※ 引述《bluedolphin ( GENAU)》之铭言：
: ※ 引述《victoryss (☞ ☑中间选民 ☑爱歹玩)》之铭言：
: : 苹果
: : 复航坠机 美专家：机长尽最大力量救人
: : 复兴航空GE235昨日失事坠落基隆河，美国《CNN》访问美国前联邦航空总署监察员苏西（
: : David Soucie）指出，从各种画面和路径资讯来看，机长当时应是尽最大努力，想让伤亡
: : 减到最低。
: : 苏西称从画面逐格来看，两个螺旋桨未同步运作，左侧螺旋桨失去动力，右侧螺旋桨也不
: : 见动力，而且自动飞行状态并未启动，机师可能转为手动，避免机身击中建筑物，试图降
: : 落河中，减少伤亡。
: : 此外，美国前运输部督察长施亚佛（Mary Schiavo）也对《CNN》指出，从机师在坠机前
: : 发出的通联记录来看，应该是机械故障，让机长发出紧急讯号。但她也相信，当时机长的
: : 操作和飞行路径，正是尽力要让伤亡减到最低。（施旖婕／综合外电报导）
: : http://ppt.cc/ORB9
: : R.I.P. 谢谢你机长!
: 想请问谁看过这段CNN的访问?
: 我刚刚看到几个片段 好像跟苹果报的片段不一样
: Edited: 附上CNN官方访问片段
: http://goo.gl/27f8TG
: Edited: 因为不知道是不是报导错误还是不同的CNN片段 修正内文
其实我有点受不太了苹果这种莫名的造神运动行为
我因为每天都有 AC360 的习惯
昨天我才听到 David Soucie 讲他对于这次坠机事件的看法
事实上他跟 Richard Quest 都没有“非常肯定”讲说机长做的一定就是对的 换言之
也就是说从未说过机师本身的操纵方式是对的 事实上如果你们看我接下来贴的逐字稿
你就会发现它其实有在暗示这起意外很有可能是人为因素:
COOPER: All right. Let's take a look here on the magic wall. Just walk us
through the video of what exactly we're seeing.
RICHARD QUEST, AVIATION CORRESPONDENT: Right. So there's two shot (INAUDIBLE)
angles at the moment starting with the close-up. And here, you basically see
the aircraft coming over head and the dramatic turn if you liked and crashing
into the bridge. But if you look at it from a slightly different angle, if
you take this particular picture and you see something quite different. Well,
you see something in a different angle because here you see the plane, if it
comes straight in and you see the plane and at that point is, it's pretty
straight and on a downward trajectory, but it still is moving with the wings
both level. It's at this point that the left wing appears to stall and stall
very badly and dramatically when there's very little height to the ground and
that, of course, is there.
Now, someone suggests, was the pilot trying to avoid these buildings? I think
if you look quite clearly,this is not the case. It's an aircraft, it's an
extremist. It is going straight down, the wing has stalled and it goes
straight into the water.
DAVID SOUCIE, CNN SAFETY ANALYST: You know, I think Richard, I've flown out
at Taipei, I'm sure you have as well. And you know that there's only
apartments there and they kind a follow the river out to protect from noise
pollution over the apartments. So you follow the river just a little bit and
you can see there too that, as it clears, those apartments and may be a
little bit of an optical illusion as it comes over the apartments.
But I believe that he was trying to make that left turn.
(这边虽然是有说好像要试图转向，但是请看下一段)
But I think importantly too if you look about at that point in the video,
that you can see that that left prop, I don't think it's feathered. It looks
as though it might be feathered. But I don't think it is. But it looks to me
it isn't.
COOPER: When you say feathered, what does that mean?
SOUCIE: That means that the propellers is supposed to automatically when that
engine stops producing thrust, the propellers is supposed to automatically go
from an angle like this to straight on right with the air flow that allows no
resistance, no wind resistance.However, if the auto-feathers switch, which
is the last you do before you take off, if that hasn't been turned to the on
position, then the engine fails and you basically have a 12 foot in diameter
piece of wood out there,it's just preventing the left wing from flying.
And I think that that might give us a clue there.I'm anxious to see what the
black boxes will tell us because that information is in the black box.
(这边可以知道顺桨的英文叫做 feather，然后他点出了没有顺桨可能会导致无法
Lifting)
COOPER: But Richard, I mean, if a plane loses one engine, it should still be
able to fly, should it? QUEST: Right, absolutely. And this is the conundrum