这份文件日期(Foreign Office, S.W. 1., 10th February, 1955.)
在中日合约签订之后.
中日合约签了但台湾主权依然不属于中华民国及中华人民共合国.
英国官方文件:
filestore.nationalarchives.gov.uk/pdfs/large/cab-129-73.pdf
JURIDICAL ASPECTS OF THE FORMOSA SITUATION
....In the Japanese Peace Treaty of April, 1952, Japan formally
renounced all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores,
but again this did not operate as a transfer to Chinese sovereignty,
whether to the Chinese People's Republic or to the Chinese
Nationalist authorities. ...
大略意思:
...1952年日本正式放弃所有关于台湾澎湖权利, 但是这并不构成转移成
为中国主权, 不论是中华人民共和国, 或中华民国...
换句话说, 中华民国跟中华人民共和国无台湾澎湖主权.
http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1977-80v13/d183
美官方文件
时间: December 30, 1978
略译:
国民党官员不断请求(美国官员)承认中华民国对台湾de jure的主权(这应该
表示中华民国没有台湾主权). 国民党官员无法接受美国跟中华民国非官方
(government-to-government basis)的关系因为对国民党官员来说是"生死"
问题. 美国官员答复美国不会变更其立场.
The Taiwan officials were pre-occupied during the discussions
with one point: Taiwan’s legal status under U.S. law. They
used this point as a surrogate for rearguing our basic
recognition decision and repeatedly asked us to reconsider our
position. I explained that our position could not be changed.
Nevertheless, they repeatedly urged us to recognize “the Republic
of China as de jure, entitled to exercise governing authority in
respect of the territories presently under its control.” In this
way, they argued, they could continue to have
government-to-government relations with the United States. They
said repeatedly, with great emphasis and feeling, that they cannot
accept relations with the United States on other than a
government-to-government basis and that they considered this a matter
of “life and death” importance.
※ 引述《chejrk (kkman)》之铭言：
: ※ 引述《oryza (绿光)》之铭言：
: : 为何会何中华民国灭亡纪念碑 ?
: : http://ppt.cc/w6v7
: : http://ppt.cc/E2DD
: : 中华民国到底灭还在不在?
: 以现实面算死一半...因为残余领土是金门、马祖。
: 但中华政府则迁于台湾.
: 爆个小挂
: 现在蕾神跑去台湾(民)政府演讲...(LIVE)
: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/usmg-tcg10