to practice

楼主: gowrite (gowrite)   2020-07-11 08:12:55
you know what, we need to be expert in every field ,
to be an expert is the best way to live good in this society.
maybe you want to be an software engineer,
maybe you want to be an hardware engineer,
maybe you want to be an staff engineer in your field
interpretation wasnt actually very accurate.
This has wide implications for anyone trying to develop a
skill and expertise, the
up to that point. Therefore, if one wanted to become one of the best in
that people who were performing at a world-class level, such as
In his book Outliers: The Story of Success, Malcolm Gladwell affirmed
whether in the arts, business, sports, or any other field.musicians,
artists, or sportspeople, had practiced for approximately 10,000 hours
However, according to inc.com, recently, the authors behind the original
study on which Gladwell based his figures claimed that his world, all he / she
had to do was to also practice for 10,000 hours.
says, highlighted in their new book Peak: Secrets From the
New Science of Expertise, added Nick Skillicorn for inc.com.music
academy in Berlin. It stated that the most
practice by their 20th birthday. That paper would go on to become a
major part of the scientific literature on expert performers, but only
In 1993, Anders Ericsson, Ralf Krampe, and Clemens Tesch-Rmer
published the results of a study on a group of violin students in a
son and co-author Robert Pool wanted to clarify what the science actually
attracted mainstream attention after Outliers was published. Recently,
Ericsaccomplished students had put in an average of 10,000 hours of
BY ROMANITA OPREA
Mar 204 min read
In his book Outliers: The Story of Success, Malcolm Gladwell
affirmed that people who were performing at a world-class level,
such as musicians, artists, or sportspeople, had practiced for
approximately 10,000 hours up to that point. Therefore, if one
wanted to become one of the best in the world, all he / she had
to do was to also practice for 10,000 hours.
However, according to inc.com, recently, the authors
behind the original study on which Gladwell based his
figures claimed that his interpretation wasnt actually
very accurate. This has wide implications for anyone trying
to develop a skill and expertise, whether in the arts, business,
sports, or any other field.
In 1993, Anders Ericsson, Ralf Krampe, and Clemens Tesch-Rmer
published the results of a study on a group of violin students
in a music academy in Berlin. It stated that the most accomplished
students had put in an average of 10,000 hours of practice by their
20th birthday. That paper would go on to become a major part of
the scientific literature on expert performers, but only attracted
mainstream attention after Outliers was published. Recently,
Ericsson and co-author Robert Pool wanted to clarify what the
science actually says, highlighted in their new book Peak: Secrets
From the New Science of Expertise, added Nick Skillicorn for inc.com.
As Business Insider shows, Harvard prof and Emotional Intelligence
author Daniel Goleman said the 10,000 hour was only half true,
while a group of psychologists have rejected the rule outright.
Within that study, there was no magic number for greatness.
10,000 hours was not actually a number of hours reached,
but an average of the time elites spent practicing.
Some practiced for much less than 10,000 hours. Others for over 25,000 hours.
Additionally, Gladwell failed to adequately distinguish between the quantity
of hours spent practicing, and the quality of that practice. This misses a
huge portion of Ericssons findings, and is the reason why Tim Ferriss
scoffs at Gladwells 10,000 hour rule in this video,
yeah , I will keep learning it , keep doing , yeah,
We all need to be keep practiceto be an expert.
yeah , keep faith.

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com