唉，懒得回应这种抹黑。资料在这里，大家自己比较就好了。
自由主义与改革宗无关？
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schleiermach
Friedrich Schleiermacher
German theologian and philospher
Friedrich Daniel Ernst Schleiermacher was born on November 21, 1768, in
Breslau, Lower Silesia (now Wroclaw, Poland). Despite his being 【the son of
a Reformed clergyman】, Schleiermacher studied under the Moravian Brethren
(Herrnhuters), gaining from them an appreciation for the Latin and Greek
classics and a strong sense of religious life. He found the teaching of the
Herrnhuters too restrictive, however, because the faculty refused to lecture
on current intellectual trends. In 1787 he entered the University of Halle,
where he studied the philosophies of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant.
After his ordination in 1794 he accepted a position as a 【Reformed preacher
】 in Berlin. There he mingled with German romantic philosophers, became a
friend of Friedrich von Schlegel, and began a translation of the works of
Plato. Apart from a period when he was professor of theology at Halle
(1804-07), most of his life from his ordination in 1794 until his death was
spent as a preacher and teacher in Berlin. From 1810 he was professor of
theology at the newly founded university there.

(′・ω・`) 燃烧生命的最后一章 ~ The End ~

感恩老鱼，赞叹老鱼～ 到底是路德宗敬虔派影响士来马赫多，还是改革宗神学影响士来马赫多呢？我们请号称改革宗的同学们，来说说士来马赫对于改革宗的继承内容。更不要说自由神学的核心--历史主义，其源头是从哪里来的不过硬要扯加尔文，不如说就是“人文主义”吧；但为何历史主义（方法称为历史批判）建构了自由神学？这部份人文主义，或者加尔文神学，都无法说明。

感恩师父，赞叹师父，我直指的重点都没有回应到，却搞得一副都说明完毕的样子，果然弟子们又要传为美谈了～原创的、有生命力的自由神学出于德国的路德宗传统，并且现在仍然都还在蓬勃发展中；而现代的基要主义则是发展于改革宗的阵营；但这些现实状况都不重要，反正师父说得算士来马赫神学的核心：“绝对依赖的感觉”跟敬虔派神学关系比较少，跟加尔文神学关系比较大，是这样的吗？XD德国的路德宗跟改革宗基本上是分不太开的，例如改革宗的潘霍华也是言必称马丁路德；德国的神学，就是在路德宗的影响底下。但这也造就了自由神学的优点及缺点。你们只谈缺点，正因为不理解整个脉络；结果变成把加尔文当成自由神学的老祖宗XD