疯法贴vt烤肉分享观后心得　好歹还会讲一下内容
贴英文就直接不翻了　让大家自己看==
不愧是大公典范　我很尊敬疯法
※ 引述《wizardfizban (疯法师)》之铭言：
: Judge dismisses antitrust lawsuit filed against Valve
: https://www.pcgamer.com/judge-dismisses-antitrust-lawsuit-filed-against-valve/
: 之前Valve向法官要求驳回，因为证据完全不足。
: 最新消息就是法官同意了Valve的看法，所以这个反垄断案被驳回了。
: 驳回的理由在这
: The ruling, available in full on CourtListener, says Wolfire's lawsuit falls
: short on two separate points. First, the claim that Valve is illegally tying
: the Steam store to the platform—essentially, using the near-monopoly of
: Steam as a library, launcher, and social media platform to force people to
: buy games through the Steam storefront—is rejected because the allegations
: in the lawsuit suggest that the Steam platform and storefront are in fact "a
: single product within the integrated game platform and transaction market."
法官认为 Wolfire 有两点主张，无法让法官同意
第一点是主张 Valve 把 Steam 商店非法地跟 Steam 平台绑在一起
实质上就是利用 Steam 作为统合游戏库、执行器与社群媒体功能的平台，
这种准独占性
强迫人们透过 Steam 商店买游戏
法官反对的原因是认为这主张意味着
Steam 平台和商店实际上就是
“在游戏（相关服务）整合平台与交易市场中的单一个商品”
: Wolfire's lawsuit also claims that Valve uses its near-monopoly to charge an
: excessive fee to sellers—30%—that wouldn't be sustainable in a competitive
: marketplace. That claim resulted in some interesting conversations earlier
: this year, but the judge rejected the argument, noting that Valve's take has
: remained unchanged throughout Steam's history, even as other online stores
: charging lower percentages have come and gone.
: "Therefore, it would appear that the market reality, at least as plead, is
: that [Valve's] fee is commensurate with the Steam Platform's value to game
: publishers," the ruling states.
Wolfire 第二点主张是说 Valve 用这种准独占性要求卖家付出 30% 的高额手续费
在竞争强烈的市场中，对卖家来说是很重的负担
法官驳回了这个主张
他说从有 Steam 以来，虽然期间也有其他更低抽成的网络商店来来去去，
但 Valve 的抽成比率从未变过
所以法官认为从市场现实来看
（Valve 收的）手续费对于游戏出版商而言
是符合 Steam 平台的价值的
哀，这个社会是现实的

我又不懂法律 之前自己翻就被嘘过 那还不如给懂的弄

应该是找不到中国(X)中文(O)媒体报导的缘故

差个字就有差 我是真不懂 我又没唸法律 XD

打架

大师

还以为你只会发吃大便文==怎么全删了==

所以译也不行 不译也不行 你们真难伺候

可恶 我也以为是废文 结果竟然认真翻喔

我不是大公 谢谢 我愿意把时间用在看v

内有恶心 …咦？

昨天的好吃文捏==

好吃文全删了==

翻译推

大师 我一直很尊敬自杀peko的文采

这是要转换形象?

发完一篇删一篇

好好吃馁

其实法官没驳回大家才会认真看文吧，不然就快速看过去不会记理由。我又不是读法律系的

疯法大 以前在雨港基隆就讲错独立开发游戏的定义 烧了好几天 现在不懂就不翻了 是一种进步耶我觉得不懂不要乱翻比较好