Re: [闲聊] 假如草案通过 那些作品最有可能被禁?

楼主: seaEPC (没看见,我没看见 >_<)   2019-02-19 15:15:39
※ 引述《w40w40w40w40 ()》之铭言:
: 就现在版上吵得沸沸扬扬的联合国防范二次元儿童色情草案啦
: 假如真的通过并且实施
: 现下有哪些作品有可能会被禁呢?
: 我觉得物语系列极危险啦
假如草案通过...
那不是当然应该先来看草案讲啥吗?
https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?
symbolno=INT/CRC/INF/8870&Lang=en
61. Child pornography is defined in article 2 OPSC as
“any representation of a child engaged in real or simulated explicit
sexual activities, regardless of the means used, or any representation of
the sexual parts of a child for primarily sexual purposes”
这段是OPSC( https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/OPSCCRC.aspx )
里对儿色的定义
62. The Committee urges States parties to prohibit, by law, child sexual abuse
material in any form. The Committee notes that such material is
increasingly circulating online, and strongly recommends States parties to
ensure that relevant provisions of their Criminal Codes cover all forms of
material, including when the acts listed in article 3.1(c) are committed
online and including when such material represents realistic
representations of non-existing children.
OPSC article 3.1(c)的定义是
(c) Producing, distributing, disseminating, importing, exporting, offering,
selling or possessing for the above purposes child pornography as defined
in article 2.
草案强烈建议各国建立刑法条款针对
制造分发散播进口出口提供销售以及持有相关儿色物件者
即使那些物件是拟真表现的非现实存在的孩童也算
(以上渣翻,有更好翻译的人请赐教)
63. The Committee is of the view that “simulated explicit sexual activities”
should be interpreted as including any material, online or offline, that
depicts or otherwise represents any person appearing to be a child engaged
in real or simulated sexually explicit conduct and realistic and/or virtual
depictions of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct.
Such depictions contribute to normalising the sexualisation of children
and fuels the demand of child sexual abuse material.
64. Moreover, for the reasons explained in paragraph 63, any representation of
the sexual parts of a child, including realistic images of the sexual
organs of a child, for primarily sexual purposes falls under the
definition of this offence.
Where it may be complicated to establish with certainty if a
representation is intended or used for “primarily sexual purposes”,
the Committee deems it necessary to consider the context in which it is
being used.
所以也是有但书的,有些东西算不算儿色要看状况,看是不是主要用在性的目的上
当然文字是死的,解释权是活的就是了
作者: Koyomiiii (Koyomi)   2019-02-19 15:17:00
寄幼女战记过去他们会不会起邱
作者: ImCasual (七星破军干你娘)   2019-02-19 15:20:00
可以寄信 hmmmmmmmmmm
作者: justice00s (Xx肥宅xX)   2019-02-19 15:20:00
寄5楼自拍 联合国瓦解
作者: ilovetaylor (taylor)   2019-02-19 15:24:00
全部都来台湾搞儿童色情算了,反正没入联
作者: Koyomiiii (Koyomi)   2019-02-19 15:26:00
台湾现在情况还算可以(无海苔之类的) 不过很可能被搞==
作者: snocia (雪夏)   2019-02-19 15:26:00
要用儿童色情才不会找台湾找死台湾已经有和外国单位合作抄儿童色情网站的记录了
作者: Koyomiiii (Koyomi)   2019-02-19 15:27:00
不过原po也有提解释权 就看日本方反应
作者: mayolane (mayolaneisyagami)   2019-02-19 15:27:00
幼女战记有任何色情成分吗
作者: Koyomiiii (Koyomi)   2019-02-19 15:28:00
就得罪超多族群的作品+主角是幼女阿XD这些对联合国来说太刺激惹
作者: LoliTube (萝管)   2019-02-19 15:30:00
台湾只是没严格管而已 硬要抄我想也不是不行
作者: siyaoran (七星)   2019-02-19 15:42:00
美国要炒谁 台湾配合度100%
作者: eiw123 (阿克西斯教信徒)   2019-02-19 16:58:00
台湾法早立好了 祇是没有大规模抓而已因为两党都不想得罪年轻人

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com