※ 引述《eqil ()》之铭言：
: 3.Mark Hannning, CFA, is writing a research report on a firm. Hanning's
: supervisor, Rob Jannsen, sees a draft which includes favorable earnings
: projections. A few days later, Hanning obtains additional data that
: causes him to revise the projections downward. Right before public
: distribution of this report, Hanning learns that Jannsen has substituted
: the earlier, more favorabl earnings projections into the report without
: Hannning's knowledge. Hanning should most appropriately:
: A. consult with internal counsel and insist that this matter be reported
: to the regulators immediately.
: B. insist that either the report be corrected, or his name be removed
: from the report
: C. permit publication of this report, but issue a follow-up report
: correcting the earnings projections.
: Ans: B
改动已经影响到预测结果，你必须反应
: 15.Jenny Pickler, a Level II CFA Candidate, writes an economic forecast
: containing several interset rate projections. Her firm's investment
: committee reviews Pickler's report and changes several of the interest
: rates Pickler ahd forecast. To comply with CFA Institute Standards,
: Pickler:
: A. does not need to take any further action.
: B. should ask that her name be removed from the report.
: C. must independently review the data supporting the investment committee's
: changes.
: Ans: A
经过了review，而也只是细微修改，没有说会影响结果，不必反应
这两个比较难区分
:

谢谢第二组和第三组的解释，第一组能否再说明仔细一点?第一组这两题都有更改预测结果吧?如果判定第一题的情节比较重大，而第二题属于细微的修改?是因为第一题是针对某个股的分析，第二题是总经的分析吗?如何 打错

我的理解是第一题的更改出现两种不同结果，所以必须反应，第二题只是针对预测结果做调整，不影响原先的预测方向

firzen说的就是我的概念