[新闻] 庞巴迪向菲航交付全世界首架两舱等Q400

楼主: nyrnu (B-18901)   2017-07-30 15:04:13
[媒体名称]Flight Global [新闻日期]2017/7/21
[网址]
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/
bombardier-delivers-first-dual-class-86-seat-q400-439527/
台风天贴一些与台风无关的讯息,不然快被洗版了.
庞巴迪向菲航交付全世界首架两舱等Q400
86-Seat in Total
Premium Economy: 10-seat with 33-inch pitch
Economy: 76-seat with 29-inch pitch
ATR72-600 30-inch pitch; 座位略佳但飞比较慢
Q400 29-Inch pitch; 座位拥挤但飞比较快
乡民你要选那一种?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Bombardier delivers first dual-class 86-seat Q400
21 JULY, 2017 SOURCE: FLIGHT DASHBOARD BY: JON HEMMERDINGER BOSTON
Bombardier has delivered its first dual-class 86-seat Q400 turboprop, handing
over the aircraft to Philippine Airlines on 20 July.
PAL became the first customer for the configuration in December 2016 when it
signed deals that included firm order for five 86-seat Q400s and purchase
rights for an additional seven aircraft. The carrier recently converted those
seven options to firm orders at the Paris air show.
PAL has chosen to outfit their aircraft with 10 premium seats with 33in pitch
and 76 economy seats with 29in pitch.
Thai low-cost carrier Nok Air already operates seven 86-seat Q400s, albeit in
an all-economy configuration. It was the launch customer for the high density
variant of the aircraft, which typically carries 76 or 78 passengers.
Bombardier will deliver five Q400s to PAL this year and seven in 2018, Flight
Fleets Analyzer shows.
Bombardier has been marketing a 90-seat all-economy variant of the turboprop
since February 2016, but has yet to land any customers for the denser
configuration.
作者: Roslin (Roslin)   2017-07-30 15:59:00
区域航线飞快飞慢会差到哪吗
作者: ATR72 (文人相轻自古皆然)   2017-07-30 16:01:00
唯一支持ATR72
作者: kugh2005 (我爱台铁)   2017-07-30 16:06:00
国内ATR也有两舱等啊,货舱加客舱~
作者: coolfish1103 (Fish)   2017-07-30 16:08:00
29... XD
作者: taxlaw1991 (taxlaw91)   2017-07-30 16:11:00
有乡民就一直提要买Q400不要ATR咩
作者: lawson (未来绝对值得期待)   2017-07-30 18:15:00
" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">
台湾ATR72-600足矣
作者: gitans (阿左)   2017-07-30 18:36:00
两种我都搭过但是Q400内部空间看起来大一点点
作者: xylophone135 (赤い三月花雪梦)   2017-07-30 19:01:00
唯一支持ATR72
作者: macings (Zach)   2017-07-30 20:10:00
区域航线距离拉长Q400优势就有了,但台湾没这种航线
作者: ttnakafzcm (燦's)   2017-07-30 20:35:00
台湾的航线长度用ATR就好 用Q400效益比ATR糟 飞机还比ATR贵 真的是傻了才买Q400 加上又友软脚事件
作者: suzukihiro (慢慢的等待)   2017-07-30 21:14:00
我怎么觉得ATR椅距大一点
作者: starbuckser0 (不应侷限于两条平行线内)   2017-07-30 22:25:00
搭过ANA的Q400 舒适~
作者: aitt (君子之交淡若水(M))   2017-07-30 23:43:00
ATR比较麻烦的地方在于空难纪录与机率有些高
作者: ttnakafzcm (燦's)   2017-07-30 23:53:00
不会开怪东西烂XD GE的ATR失事记录几乎都是人为因素
作者: aitt (君子之交淡若水(M))   2017-07-30 23:57:00
国外的ATR也是一堆空难纪录
作者: wx9950a (Penghu.a-ming)   2017-07-31 00:16:00
大家都在玩同一机种,选不一样的没比较好
作者: Andriy6016 (阿群)   2017-07-31 08:49:00
旅客还不是问:啊有没有喷射机
作者: relio (瑞哩欧)   2017-07-31 11:18:00
Q400优势明显很多
作者: xylophone135 (赤い三月花雪梦)   2017-07-31 12:43:00
又扯空难率zzzzz
作者: macings (Zach)   2017-08-01 05:07:00
Q400对比ATR的优势在爬升快飞的快,但台湾就算北高航线这种短程距离Q400根本只有烧油钱的优势Q400如果真的适合台湾市场,那B7操作过很长时间的DHC 8 -200跟300怎么不继续买Q400,DHC-8家族国际上也摔过好几架

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com