[必]我已经读过置底版规、参考费率、发文必读公告，并愿意遵守规定：YES
* 如已读过，请填 YES
* 如未读过，请读过再重新发文。未填视为未读，一律删文处理并警告。
──────────────────────────────────────
[必]工 作 量： 35,350字
[必]工作报酬： 0.6元/字
[必]涉及语言： 美式英文
[必]所属领域： 法律/哲学
[必]文件类型： 学位论文
[必]截 稿 日： 2017/12/17
[必]应征期限： 2017/11/26
[必]联络方式： [email protected]
[必]付费方式： 预付5,000元订金，交稿后3天内付清余额。
──────────────────────────────────────
[选]工作要求： 应征者有润饰过学术期刊论文的经验
[选]参考段落： The aim of this thesis is to research into the legitimacy and
justification of the preventive detention of dangerous inmates. This is
initially due to a deep concern of such detention becoming a practical
alternative for death penalty. In Taiwan, death penalty is nevertheless within
several criminal laws, and from 2010 to 2015, like a routine, the government
had executed four to six death-row inmates annually after a four-year
suspension. Even though the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights (“ICCPR”) was ratified right after the Legislative Yuan passed an Act
to Implement the two human-rights Covenants in 2009, its ultimate stance of
“the abolition of capital punishment”seems to have no influence on the
decisions of the government. Rather, greater tensions between human rights NGOs
and general population have been created. Since then the debate between the
abolition camp and the anti-abolition camp has been rampantly re-initiated in
not only academia but also media. Politicians were forced by the reporters to
disclose their positions before elections; but facing an 84% of public opinion
against abolishment, even those belong to“liberal”parties cannot but answer
the question awkwardly.
[选]试 译 文： 请以追踪修订方式试润以上参考段落
[选]其他事项： 来信时请附上简单的经历与介绍，将优先考虑native speaker或相关学术
背景者。
──────────────────────────────────────