http://www.patentlyapple.com/patently-apple/2017/12/apple-hammered-with-class-action-5-for-slowing-iphone-battery-issue.html
In the modern digital age, batteries "wear" over time.
The lithium-ion battery used by Apple slowly diminishes its
ability to hold a charge with time and use. However, normal
lithium-ion battery wear does not reduce performance;
a weakening battery has no effect on performance unless
there is software that links the two. And that is precisely
what Apple did.
In rolling out iOS 10.2.1, Apple claimed to "bug fixes and
improve [ ] the security of [the] iPhone or iPad" and "improve
[ ] power management during peak workloads to avoid
unexpected shutdowns on the iPhone."
What Apple purposefully failed to disclose, however, was
that the update would act as a latent time-bomb that
slowly eroded the phone's performance to the frustration
of the user – the software update throttled the handset's
performance.
==========
苹果因为降频而被告的第五个class action
理由:
电池本身就会随着时间损耗 但是电池本身耗损跟性能并没有关系
除非有软件将两者挂勾 然而这正是苹果所做的事
苹果并未告知这次的软件更新将用电池耗损来逐渐杀死手机的性能
====
加州也准备好了