[国际] 夏立民:中国在联合国赞成判同志死刑

楼主: quendigay (小虾妈妈来扫地)   2017-10-05 14:41:14
https://goo.gl/8pfL5p
夏立民 脸书粉丝 
https://fb.me/tsoutsouhan
联合国投票要谴责判同志死刑。结果你猜有哪些国家反对?
中国China, 孟加拉Bangladesh, 博茨瓦纳Botswana, 布隆迪Burundi, 埃及Egypt,埃塞俄比亚 Ethiopia, 印度India, 伊拉克Iraq, 日本Japan, 卡达Qatar, 沙特阿拉伯Saudi Arabia, 阿拉伯联合酋长国the United Arab Emirates and 美国the United States.
#可耻
https://goo.gl/pY3vzT
China votes against UN resolution to condemn death penalty for gays and lesbians
by Alex Linder in News on Oct 4, 2017 6:30 pm
gay_execution.jpg
In 2005, Mahmoud Asgari, 16, and Ayaz Marhoni, 18, were publicly hanged after being convicted of raping a 13-year-old boy. Critics of the decision have said that the two were executed for consensual homosexual sex.
On September 29th, China joined 12 other countries in voting against a United Nations resolution aimed at condemning countries for executing people for having gay sex.
The Human Rights Council resolution asked countries in which the death penalty is legal to ensure that it is not applied "arbitrarily or in a discriminatory manner" or imposed against those under the age of 18, pregnant women, or for adultery, blasphemy and consensual same-sex relations.
Despite China's nay vote, the resolution passed with 27 members of the council voting for, 13 against and seven abstaining from the vote.
In its opposition to the resolution, China was joined by Bangladesh, Botswana, Burundi, Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Iraq, Japan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and the United States.
Afterward, a US State Department spokesperson said that the US "unequivocally condemns" the application of the death penalty to homosexuality, adultery, and religious offenses, explaining that their vote against the resolution was really only a vote for the death penalty.
"We voted against that resolution because of broader concerns with the resolution’s approach in condemning the death penalty in all circumstances, and it called for the abolition of the death penalty altogether," the spokesperson said.
The Human Rights Council resolution actually calls upon states that have not already abolished the death penalty to "consider doing so." You can read the full resolution here.
China's rationale for voting against the resolution was likely very similar to America's. The country has not abolished the death penalty, in fact, it executes more people each year than the rest of the world combined, though it keeps these statistics secret. Additionally, on the international stage, China is always quick to support giving countries the freedom to handle their own affairs inside their own borders with their own laws, allowing Beijing to brush off criticism regarding human rights abuses
from the UN or US.
Back in 2010, China voted against a UN General Assembly resolution aimed at reinserting "sexual orientation" into a resolution condemning extrajudicial, summary and arbitrary executions, casting its "nay" vote alongside countries like Benin, Saudi Arabia, Malawi, Somalia, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
There are currently six countries where the death penalty is used for people in same-sex relationships: Iran, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Somalia and Sudan. Gay people in areas of Iraq and Syria that are controlled by ISIS are also at risk of being executed.
Homosexuality is not a crime in China. In 2001, it was removed from the country's list of psychiatric disorders. Though, China remains far from a gay-friendly place to live.
作者: capricorner (魔羯角落)   2017-10-05 14:44:00
日本 跟 美国也有阿....
楼主: quendigay (小虾妈妈来扫地)   2017-10-05 14:49:00
反正活在政治高层阶级的人类都视弱势如草芥各国皆然为了石油和权贵权势人命就不是人命
作者: tnit (碌碌碌碌)   2017-10-05 14:51:00
这标题是不是和原判决有出入呢?夏有提到,美日的这个决议有可能也是顾虑到关联废除死刑与否导致的影响
作者: x747 (skate)   2017-10-05 16:31:00
快点叫舔中艺人抗议 只有他们有影响力
作者: my9005 (哲~)   2017-10-05 16:41:00
中国真是一个无耻的妖孽国!
作者: chihchuan (Andy)   2017-10-05 16:45:00
不谴责跟赞成不一样吧...
作者: innuendo3324   2017-10-05 16:55:00
日本跟美国是怎么回事 ??
作者: noruas (酪乳)   2017-10-05 16:58:00
原PO自行删除4则推文
作者: violetstar (bluestar)   2017-10-05 17:01:00
美国应该跟川普有关吧
作者: jaannddyy (詹敌)   2017-10-05 17:31:00
不谴责已经很严重了好吗,如果是决议要谴责抓到犹太人判死刑,你看美国敢不敢不谴责呵呵
作者: kalestorm (没心情)   2017-10-05 17:35:00
我说,就算你要滥用这种标题,加在别人的名下,不是更恶意吗?
作者: immercury   2017-10-05 17:36:00
日本跟美国是怎么回事
作者: kalestorm (没心情)   2017-10-05 17:37:00
然后,联合国人权理事会虽说不是毫无用处,但这种决议大多只是国际政治的奇怪游戏
作者: suntex (中产小市民)   2017-10-05 17:38:00
要谴责的死刑不只有对同性恋 所以美国日本反对加入 报导中有提到中国反对的理由与美国类似 这标题满满恶意
作者: maxw1102 (DR. Strange)   2017-10-05 17:51:00
中国就算了 日本是怎样
作者: chihchuan (Andy)   2017-10-05 18:29:00
一堆人没看内文在高潮科科
作者: HOLAHOJIAN (HOLA)   2017-10-05 18:44:00
日美也有ㄚ
作者: calmnova (土波波)   2017-10-05 18:45:00
总之 嘘嘘看0.0
作者: likeaprayer (Dreamlover)   2017-10-05 19:24:00
这篇太误导了... 美日都在内完全不提
作者: wahimodeux (哇嗨摸2次)   2017-10-05 19:25:00
美国护家盟的力量本来就很强大
作者: startwinkle (星烁)   2017-10-05 23:04:00
美日重要的国家都不讲,误导性标题

Links booklink

Contact Us: admin [ a t ] ucptt.com