有 SerB 的 Q&A 才精彩啊～ 前几天的…抱歉，有空再说吧
- Q: “Is arty balance okay? They seem to be crawling out of woodwork again.”
A (SerB): “It’s fine. It’s good that there’s more of them.”
Q:“自走砲的平衡没问题吧？它们似乎又重出江湖了”SerB:“没问题。数量成长是好事”
- Q: “What’s up with supertesters, I see them driving around in random
battles with exclusive tanks and they suck!” A: (SerB) “If you have to
envy, do it silently.”
Q:“超测人员有什么毛病吗？看他们开超测车打随机战斗，而且表现烂透了”SerB:“眼
红就眼红，也不用出来嚷嚷”
- Q: “If we had Panzer IV and T-34 in historical configurations, what tiers
would they fit?” A (SerB): “You see, that depends on the historical number
of hitpoints.”
Q:“四号和T-34如果套用史实数据，应该放在几阶？”SerB:“要看生命值的史实数据而
定。”
- Q: “It was said that the T110E4 has worse aimtime than E3 as a price for
having a turret. How come German WT’s have the same stats as the
non-turretted German TD’s?” A: “Just imagine that the Germans implemented
it better.” (SS: as in, it’s just a balance decision)
Q:“据说 110E4 的瞄准时间比 E3 差是因为有砲塔的缘故。那为啥德国有砲塔TD的瞄准
时间会跟没砲塔的一样？”A:“想成德国工艺较佳就行了”（SS:纯粹是为了平衡）
- SerB states that the situation, where optics get destroyed by hitting driver
’s periscopes is correct
SerB 表示驾驶的潜望镜被击中而造成观测装置被毁并没有错
- IS and IS-3 have the same D-25 (D-2-5) reload times as KV-3 and KV-4,
despite IS series having one loader and KV series two historically, because
the second loader “eliminates the design drawback”
虽然装填手人数较少，IS 和 IS-3 跟 KV-3、KV-4 用同一门 D-25 时装填时间却相同。
这是因为 KV 系列的第二装填手“抵销了设计上缺失”
- Individual Missions are time limited, but the limit is quite long. They
will come in seasons, around half a year ones.
个人任务有时限，但很长。一季大约半年。
- Evilly states that when it comes to difficult missions, “cumulative effect
is better than everyday grind” (admits that the previous very difficult
grinding missions – specifically the KV-220 one on RU server – were a
mistake)
Evilly 对困难的任务表示“做成累积进度的效果比逼你每天消磨要来的好”（承认之前
要每天都要磨进度的困难任务是错误设计，特别是俄服的 KV-220 任务）
- Evilly states that the Object 260 missions will be intentionally very
difficult
Evilly 表示 Object 260 的任务是故意做得非常难
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/11/22/22-11-2014/