- Storm states that over the last year, the player credit gain from tier 8
premium tanks increased, since Wargaming (several times) improved the tier 8
premium tank money making ability
Storm 表示过去一年来玩家在八阶金车上愈赚愈多，因为WG多次调高八阶金车的赚钱系数
- map Stalingrad is currently in development
“史达林格勒”地图现正开发中
- Havok implementation will not bring effects such as camo net appearance on
the tank, it will bring nice looking object destruction and dynamic equipment
on tank (SS: as in fuel cans, tools etc.) that’s hanging, moving and can be
ripped off by explosions
Havok 不会自带装备模型（伪装网、V镜…）功能，但会有可动部件（可以轰掉的箱子、链
条等）
- developers will definitely continue to develop the 0.9.1 test “Hellcat”
sounds
9.1 测试服出现的音效会持续发展
- nothing is known of the FV217 TD/SPG according to Cannoneer
据 Cannoneer 说法，完全没有 FV217 的消息
- 9.3 will bring Hellcat nerf
- T49 will not be nerfed in 9.3
9.3 砍地狱猫，但不会动 T49
- the reason why WG implemented FV215b instead of having Chieftain from the
start was that when the British tree was introduced, the Chieftain was
considered to be too modern. After that, they sent people to measure the
armor (SS: in Bovington) and found out that it’s not actually as fearsome as
it was thought before.
不放酋长式而创造 FV215b 的原因在于当初认为它太先进。但后来派人去 Bovington
测量实车后发现，它的装甲其实没这么恶心。
- Centurion Mk.10 can’t be British tier 10 – its armor upgrade is already
in the tier 9 Centurion 7/1 (the “/1〃 part specifically signifies the armor
upgrade)
百夫长 Mk.10 无法当十阶车；它的装甲升级部份已经放在九阶了（‘/1’代表它是装甲升
级的型号）（译注：Mk.10是Mk.8的装、砲升级版，Mk.7/1是Mk.7的装甲升级版；而7和8没
差太多）
- Ruinberg on fire lighting ugly and reducing performance? “How terrible”
Ruinberg on fire 的打光很难看又拖累效能？“好贴萝卜”
- top light tank economy (income vs repair cost) will not be buffed
不会改善顶阶轻坦的经济
- quality of armor (depending on material) coefficient will not be implemented
不会有装甲品质系数
- Vickers MBT with Mk.3 turret? Storm: “I don’t know yet”
维克斯会装 Mk.3 砲塔（1970年代中期的升级版）？Storm:“还不知道”
- reducing the gun aim time for most tanks to make battles more filled with
action? “That would reduce the role of armor in the game even more”, Storm
adds that compensating it with reduced normalization is not a solution
either, as it is near zero anyway as it is
不会全面降低瞄准时间，减少转正角亦不可行
- Wargaming cooperating with modmakers? “Why? We can make such features too”
WG 会跟模组作家合作？“我们自己能搞”（译者：只是不知道拖到何年何月…）
- Tundra map will not be removed from the game
不会移除 Tundra 地图
- 25 percent RNG will not be reduced
不会减少 25% 浮动值（译者：再问禁言一个月）
- a player proposes that tier 10 tank destroyers could have their penetration
nerfed from 300+ to 270-280 and compensated that with increased accuracy,
Storm states this will not happen
有人提了蠢建议，略
- Type 4 Chi-To stock and elite turret identical? “One is cast, the other is
welded. Look here. The top one has depression of -10, stock one of -6,5〃
四式中战的砲塔升级前后没差？见此：http://i.imgur.com/dhSmFfk.jpg；俯角也有差
- too many 3-4 HT5 vs 3-4 MT5 battles on tier 5? “Coincidence”
五阶场分房太常出现一边顶车是三、四台重坦而另一边是三、四台中坦？“纯属巧合”
- historical battles will not return soon
历史战斗近期不会回来
- Q: “How do developers regard “german-lover” players (wehraboos) who play
only German tanks?” A: “Not in any special way. Players are players.”
Q:“开发人员怎么看待只玩德国车的德厨玩家（wehraboos）？”A:“没啥特别”
- “Soviet tank only” and “German tank only” clans will not be supported
in any special way
不会特别支援“全苏联车”或“全德国车”的公会（译者：问这干麻…）
- WG will not do anything about statpadders and sealclubbers (SS: “pedobears
” in Russian)
WG 不会对洗战绩或虐菜的人怎么样
- the option for crews to remember previous tanks will not be implemented,
not even for gold
不会让成员记住前一台战车的熟练度
- Q: “What branches will there be?” A: “Lime-tree branches. And some birch
ones.”
Q:“会有哪些分支？”A:“柠檬树枝和桦木枝，你在问这个吗”
- Q: “What do you think of Stronghold mode?” A: “Nice feature for clans.”
略
- the fact itself that a vehicle is very common in battles that does not make
a reason for rebalance (SS: but it is a good indicator of a vehicle to watch)
不会单因受欢迎就重平衡那台车（SS: 但是好好检视的指标）
- it’s possible that new British TD’s will come this year (SS: as a part of
the Firefly branch)
今年可能会出新的英国TD线
- Q: “Will the players be able to put various stuff on their tank as extra
armor plates, boxes and stuff?” A: “Very distant future”
可以在车上自行加装东西吗，例如装甲板、工具箱？“在那遥远的未来…”
- Q: “How are you planning to nerf Chaffee in 9.3?” A: “We will remove its
wheels and gun”
9.3 要怎么砍霞飞？“打算把轮子和砲拆掉”
- credit/XP penalties for losing will not be removed (SS: yes, someone
actually asks that)
不会移除战败的经验/银币惩罚（译者：请禁言一年）
- for now, nothing will be done about gold shells for credits
不前不会动金弹银买机制
- significant changes if armor when T-62A gets reworked to HD? “I am not
sure that we have such detailed armor schematics for T-62A turret”
T-62A HD 化的时候装甲会大改？“我不确定我们手上有没有 T-62A 砲塔的详细图纸”
- it’s possible that the “Chinese Wall” map (available currently on
Chinese server only) will return, but “it depends on player opinion” (SS:
not sure how they want to collect player opinion on a map that’s not in the
game)
‘长城’地图有可能回归（SS: 目前只有陆服玩得到），但“要看玩家的反应”（SS: 大
家都玩不到，是想怎么收集意见？）
见：http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/new-asian-map-great-wall/
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/25/25-7-2014/