我觉得骇客任务其实根本不是讲什么桶中脑或是人工智能的电影
它其实是在把金融制度运作的原理透过电影隐喻性的透漏出来
因为我近期在金融研究有一些的收获和理解
我益发觉得骇客任务就是在讲金融的运作道理
比方说
我最近在研究周期对数加速定理
它就有提到
肇因于金融泡泡衍生出来的超额报酬率一定会跟一个叫做风险率(Hazard rate)
有个互相抵销的关系
抵销的背后原因在于必须满足
no abritadge condiftion 或是 no free lunch principle
也就是公正的赌局期望值一定是零的这件事情
当金融泡泡越长越大， 风险率会伴随增大
就跟骇客任务的Neo 一样，当它后期开始可以飞天遁地之后。
Agent smith也同时变得越来越强大。
这个两者一起变强互相制衡的概念 就是
超额报酬率(Neo)和风险率(Smith)间的那互相制衡的关系
当Smith最后强大到要毁灭母体和一切时
Neo只能跟Smith同归于尽了
以下节录电影我觉得很精彩的一些对话
ORACLE: Everything that has a beginning has an end. I see the end coming. I
see the darkness spreading. I see death. And you are all the stands in his
way."
NEO: Smith?
ORACLE: Very soon, he is going to have the power to destroy this world, but I
believe he won't stop there. He can't. He won't stop until there's nothing
left at all.
NEO: What is he?
ORACLE: He is you, your opposite, your negative, the result of the equation
trying to balance itself out.
NEO: And if I can't stop him?
ORACLE: One way or another, Neo, this war is going to end.
Oracle讲的那个Equation我刚好最近有推导到:
基本上就是一个随机微分方程 有对应超额报酬和风险率的项在里面
https://i.imgur.com/RMx5J0S.png
而要满足鞅定理(Martingale hypothsis)
风险率和超额报酬率一定要互相抵消
这个互相抵消的过程就是Oracle讲的Inevietablity (不可避免性或是宿命论)
有人曾经这样解读过骇客任务的吗?
能否讨论一下?