我想提供我的专案给GNU Software，
不过失败了，以下是我跟GNU Software人员的对话，
有些部份，为了隐私，打马赛克。
=Ineiev========================================
Hello, ***!
Unfortunately, we have to decline your offer. The goal
of the GNU Project is to develop and enhance the GNU operating
system, and your program doesn't fit it in many ways: its
primary platform is Windows, it uses GPL-incompatible license
for its source code and even nonfree license for its documentation,
its only UI language is Chinese, its build procedure doesn't
comply with GNU standards. Moreover, the scope of your program
considerably overlaps with already existing GNU programs, and
accepting your program would mean suboptimal use of our resources.
Thank you once again for offering your package to GNU.
=Me=============================================
Hello, Ineiev!
The main platform for running the program is indeed Windows, but it can also
run on macOS and Linux. Although I haven't personally built it for Linux, if
Cython can be used to build it on Linux, it should be runnable there as well.
As for the documentation, it was written by another friend on the internet,
and if there are copyright concerns, we can remove the documentation part.
Regarding the user interface (UI), it is currently in Chinese, but there are
not many Chinese characters involved. If it has the opportunity to become
part of GNU software, we can easily add English text since there are not many
words involved. The reason English text is not currently used is because the
program is a ***(打马赛克), which is actually a ***(打马赛克) played with
Taiwanese rules. The ***(打马赛克) themselves are represented using Chinese
characters, so the UI text is also in Chinese.
As for GNU games, while there are many ***(打马赛克), to the best of my
knowledge, there hasn't been a GNU software release for ***(打马赛克) yet.
Even if this game doesn't pass GNU scrutiny, there might be some
misunderstandings regarding the points I've mentioned above.
=Ineiev=========================================
Thank you for clarifications, but even these points can't make
***(打马赛克) a feasible candidate.
=Me=============================================
Hello, thank you for your response. Since the software written in Python is
relatively large, it apparently involves more code, so I'm concerned about
potential copyright issues. I'd like to ask whether software written in
Python with the addition of third-party free APIs is not suitable to be
considered GNU software now? Additionally, would a tool solely written in
Python still not be suitable for GNU software? If none of the above
situations are suitable, then it naturally follows that ***(打马赛克), which
I have written, is not suitable to be part of GNU software.
=Ineiev=========================================
> Since the software written in Python is
> relatively large, it apparently involves more code, so I'm concerned about
> potential copyright issues. I'd like to ask whether software written in
> Python with the addition of third-party free APIs is not suitable to be
> considered GNU software now? Additionally, would a tool solely written in
> Python still not be suitable for GNU software?
The criteria your package doesn't pass are quite different. I outlined
a few of them in my response.
> If none of the above
> situations are suitable, then it naturally follows that ***(打马赛克),
> which I have written, is not suitable to be part of GNU software.
I must point out that it's GNU Evaluation Team who decides
whether the offered package is suitable for GNU, not you. Sorry.
================================================
以上是我跟GNU Software人员的对话，
我的英文没那么好，是用ChatGPT中翻英得到的英文，
但是，他最后一句not you, 有点触动到我的敏感神经,
拜托，我是想要无偿提供软体给你们GNU Software，
不是向GNU Software申请补助款耶，
搞清楚供需关系好吗？真是的…