The Pool Report interview was conducted by Jace Frederick (Pioneer Press)
with Crew Chief Tony Brothers following tonight’s Lakers at Timberwolves
game.
QUESTION: Why was the LeBron James shot with 2.3 seconds to play ruled a
two-pointer instead of a three-pointer after video review?
BROTHERS: The play was ruled a two-point field goal on the floor during live
play. After video review, there wasn’t clear and conclusive evidence to
overturn it from a two to a three, and that’s why it stood as a two-point
field goal.
https://twitter.com/NBAOfficial/status/1741316936330301886
赛后裁判Tony Brothers被询问说为何LBJ的2.3秒关键出手的入球在看完重播后为何是
2分而非3分
Brothers回应说这个入球一开始是判2分，并且看了重播后没有明确的证据可以推翻判决
改判3分，所以还是维持原本2分的判决
结论就是该审的都审了，所以裁判就维持原判了
话说NBA为啥都不装辅助判决之类的 不是重播那种勾天顶竟然有吗 我怎么记得还是有误判的案例
没有明确证据能推翻=我不知道！？看不出来是3分也行啊
一堆高科技摄影然后看不出来，就大胆说沾到毛边也好没有明显没踩线的证据找不到有踩线，就是用没有没踩线。双重否定，可以
作者: ioioioaoaoao 2023-12-31 13:11:00
谁判两分的，谁负责！
作者: linchihsiang (翔) 2023-12-31 13:22:00
所以如果一开始判三分 换灰狼挑战看不出来的话 还是维持原判裁判：啊 你是不会站远一点
Cade勾天顶的换成老詹也会这么热闹吗一样没有足够证据推翻原判
没证据推翻判决=\=窝不知道啊。。。就是一个很正常的回放判决，不知道为什么烧起来